Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Natural selection, mental modules and intelligence.

R M Nesse1

  • 1Department of Psychiatry and Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248, USA.

Novartis Foundation Symposium
|March 30, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The differential influence of life stress on individual symptoms of depression.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2015
Same author

Depression is more than the sum score of its parts: individual DSM symptoms have different risk factors.

Psychological medicine·2013
Same author

Evolutionary explanations of emotions.

Human nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.)·2013
Same author

Motivation and melancholy: a darwinian perspective.

Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation·2002
Same author

Marital quality and psychological adjustment to widowhood among older adults: a longitudinal analysis.

The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences·2001
Same author

The smoke detector principle. Natural selection and the regulation of defensive responses.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2001
Same journal

Genetic and therapeutic control of diabetogenic CD8+ T cells.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009
Same journal

Translating mucosal antigen based prevention of autoimmune diabetes to human.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009
Same journal

Re-establishing immune tolerance in type 1 diabetes via regulatory T cells.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009
Same journal

Immune markers of disease and therapeutic intervention in type 1 diabetes.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009
Same journal

Towards a curative therapy in type 1 diabetes: remission of autoimmunity, maintenance and augmentation of beta cell mass.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009
Same journal

CD8 and cytotoxic T cells in type 1 diabetes.

Novartis Foundation symposium·2009
See all related articles

The structure of the mind, shaped by natural selection for reproductive success, is not fully understood. Evolutionary psychology suggests domain-specific mental modules, but their precise structure remains unclear.

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • The debate on whether intelligence is a singular or multifaceted trait persists without resolution.
  • Evolutionary psychology posits domain-specific mental modules shaped by natural selection to solve adaptive problems.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the implications of evolutionary psychology for understanding the structure of human intelligence.
  • To investigate the relationship between functional demands and the structural organization of mental mechanisms.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis drawing on evolutionary psychology principles.
  • Examination of how natural selection shapes biological mechanisms.
  • Critique of common metaphors for the mind (e.g., computer, tool).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Functional demands offer limited insight into the precise structure of mental mechanisms.
  • Mental mechanisms are adapted for specific challenges rather than being entirely general.
  • Metaphors of intelligent design are misleading for understanding naturally selected minds.

Conclusions:

  • The structure of the mind is a product of natural selection, genetic mutations, and historical constraints, not intelligent design.
  • Understanding the mind requires minimizing structural metaphors and focusing on its adaptive functions.
  • Further research is needed to reconcile functional insights with the complex, intertwined nature of mental structures.