Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sampling methods for identifying differences in source reliability.

D A Montgomery1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Bradley University, Peoria, IL 61625, USA. montgom@hilltop.bradley.edu

The Journal of General Psychology
|March 30, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ion-Specific Effects on PuO<sub>2</sub> Nanoparticle Aggregation and Dissolution in Concentrated Electrolytes.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2026
Same author

The occurrence of T3 thyrotoxicosis in pregancy.

Irish journal of medical science·2016
Same author

Late Results of Adrenalectomy for Cushing's Syndrome.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine·2010
Same author

Automated telephone follow-up after breast cancer: an acceptability and feasibility pilot study.

British journal of cancer·2008
Same author

A survey of current surgical treatment of acute gallstone disease in the west of Scotland.

Scottish medical journal·2007
Same author

Follow-up in breast cancer: does routine clinical examination improve outcome? A systematic review of the literature.

British journal of cancer·2007
Same journal

The influence of the Big Five personality traits on daily internal and external aggression tendencies: a dual-pathway mechanism from the perspective of social comparison theory-a diary study.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

Cognitive and emotional benefits of piano training: effects on working memory and psychological well-being.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

The efficacy of mindfulness based interventions in mitigating stress and fostering enhanced mindfulness among higher education students.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

Age and gender differences in the factor structure of cognitive monitoring.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

How social context modulates the roles of fairness, reciprocity, and empathy on advantageous inequity aversion.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
Same journal

Predicting a few or many friends in schoolchildren: a machine learning approach.

The Journal of general psychology·2026
See all related articles

Observers effectively used across-trial variability to weight sources by reliability. However, they were inefficient at using within-trial variability for source weighting in this visual signal detection task.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Factors
  • Decision Making

Background:

  • Understanding how observers integrate information from multiple sources is crucial for optimizing human performance in complex tasks.
  • Reliability of information sources significantly influences decision-making processes, yet the efficiency of using different types of variability information remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how observers utilize across-trial and within-trial variability information to weight sources based on their reliability.
  • To compare observer performance under conditions with varying levels of available variability information.

Main Methods:

  • Three trained observers performed a multi-element visual signal-detection task.
  • Three block-type conditions were employed: fixed block (both within- and across-trial variability), partial-random (within-trial variability only), and full-random (neither variability type).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Observer performance in assigning weights to sources based on reliability was analyzed across conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • A significant block-type effect was observed, indicating that the availability of information influenced observer performance.
    • Observers successfully used across-trial variability to differentiate and weight sources according to reliability.
    • Efficiency in using within-trial variability to adjust source weights was limited, with only one participant showing significant differences across conditions.

    Conclusions:

    • Observers can effectively leverage across-trial variability to make informed decisions about source reliability.
    • The ability to efficiently use within-trial variability for dynamic source weighting appears to be a significant limitation in observer performance.
    • Findings highlight the importance of providing clear across-trial reliability cues for optimal human-system interaction.