Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A quantum mechanical/neural net model for boiling points with error estimation.

A J Chalk1, B Beck, T Clark

  • 1Computer-Chemie-Centrum, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nägelsbachstrasse 25, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany.

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences
|March 30, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Māori Models of Adult Inpatient Mental Health Services: An Integrative Literature Review.

International journal of mental health nursing·2026
Same author

Depressive traits are associated with a reduced effect of choice on intentional binding.

Consciousness and cognition·2022
Same author

Genetic variation of macronutrient tolerance in Drosophila melanogaster.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

Advanced quantitative evaluation of PET systems using the ACR phantom and NiftyPET software.

Medical physics·2022
Same author

[Update on toxoplasmosis in poultry farming].

Schweizer Archiv fur Tierheilkunde·2022
Same author

National estimates from the Youth '19 Rangatahi smart survey: A survey calibration approach.

PloS one·2021
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
Same journal

Future Papers.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·2016
See all related articles

We developed quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models using neural networks to predict normal boiling points for diverse chemical compounds. Our models achieve high accuracy, with a standard deviation of 16.5 K and R2 of 0.96 for 6000 compounds.

Area of Science:

  • Computational Chemistry
  • Cheminformatics

Background:

  • Accurate prediction of physical properties like normal boiling points is crucial for chemical research and development.
  • Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship (QSPR) models offer a computational approach to estimate these properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate robust QSPR models for predicting normal boiling points.
  • To assess the applicability of neural network-based QSPR models using semiempirical molecular orbital theory descriptors.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a neural network approach for QSPR modeling.
  • Calculated molecular descriptors using semiempirical molecular orbital (MO) theory (AM1 and PM3).
  • Employed rigorous cross-validation with 10 independently trained neural networks on a dataset of 6000 diverse compounds.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The best QSPR model achieved a standard deviation of 16.5 K for training error across 6000 compounds.
  • A high correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.96 was obtained between predicted and experimental boiling points.
  • Investigated the influence of molecular conformations and tautomerism on prediction accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • The developed neural network-based QSPR models are highly accurate and applicable to a wide range of chemical systems.
  • The methodology provides a reliable tool for predicting normal boiling points, with deviations often attributable to experimental errors or limitations of semiempirical methods.