Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Avoiding multiple pregnancies: sailing uncharted seas.

E R Hernandez1

  • 1Clinica de Reproduccion Asistida 'FIV-Madrid', C/Alvarez de Baena 4, 28006 Madrid, Spain. ehernandezm@meditex.es

Human Reproduction (Oxford, England)
|March 30, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Quantum simulations of neutral water clusters and singly-charged water cluster anions.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2022
Same author

Interrelation of Elasticity and Thermal Bath in Nanotube Cantilevers.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Paths towards equilibrium in molecular systems: The case of water.

Physical review. E·2019
Same author

A chain-of-states acceleration method for the efficient location of minimum energy paths.

The Journal of chemical physics·2015
Same author

First-principles simulations of lithium melting: stability of the bcc phase close to melting.

Physical review letters·2010
Same author

Amphiphillic organic crystals.

Journal of the American Chemical Society·2009
Same journal

A new regulatory framework: impact of the SoHO Regulation for medically assisted reproduction.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Subfertility in relation to gestational weight gain and gestational diabetes: the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Pathogenic variants in ACTRT3 lead to male infertility characterized by fertilization defects.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

A large retrospective study on 1PN embryo transfer supports the need for updated harmonized best practice guidelines.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Explainability of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs): promise, clinical reality, and conceptual limits.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Ultra-rapid versus conventional oocyte vitrification: a comparative study of clinical and molecular outcomes with single-cell transcriptomic insights.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Single embryo transfer (SET) aims to reduce multiple pregnancies in IVF. However, SET is currently not ideal due to its impact on infertile couples and IVF success rates, especially in specific patient groups.

Area of Science:

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • In Vitro Fertilization (IVF)

Background:

  • Multiple pregnancies are a significant risk associated with traditional IVF practices.
  • Single embryo transfer (SET) is proposed as a strategy to mitigate these risks.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the current suitability and implications of single embryo transfer in IVF.
  • To identify patient populations and technological advancements where SET's effectiveness requires further investigation.

Main Methods:

  • This is an opinion piece based on current understanding and clinical experience in IVF.
  • Discussion of the limitations of current IVF technology and its impact on SET efficacy.
  • Identification of specific patient demographics and advanced techniques needing further evaluation in the context of SET.
Keywords:
Genetics and Reproduction

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • SET, while conceptually sound for reducing multiple births, is deemed premature for widespread implementation.
  • Concerns exist regarding fairness to infertile couples and potential limitations on managing challenging IVF cases.
  • The impact of SET needs thorough assessment in older patients, poor responders, and alongside blastocyst transfer and pre-implantation genetic diagnosis.

Conclusions:

  • Current IVF technology limitations necessitate caution regarding the universal adoption of single embryo transfer.
  • Further research is crucial to determine optimal SET protocols for diverse patient groups and evolving IVF technologies.
  • SET's long-term impact and efficacy require comprehensive evaluation before it can be considered the definitive solution.