Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Absorbable versus non-absorbable suture in carpal tunnel decompression.

E Erel1, P I Pleasance, O Ahmed

  • 1Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Kingston General Hospital, Hull, UK. ertanerel@hotmail.com

Journal of Hand Surgery (Edinburgh, Scotland)
|April 3, 2001
PubMed
Summary

For carpal tunnel surgery, absorbable sutures (polyglactin 910) showed less inflammation at 6 weeks, while non-absorbable sutures (polypropylene) caused more patient-reported pain during wound closure.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Correction: Proliferation of activated hepatic stellate cells requires REST.

Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

The yield of CT head scans for intracranial haemorrhage in anticoagulated patients presenting with head injury.

Clinical radiology·2026
Same author

Proliferation of activated hepatic stellate cells requires REST.

Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Entrustable professional activities for physiotherapists to demonstrate digital health competency: an international delphi study.

Physiotherapy theory and practice·2025
Same author

Maternal Diaphragmatic Hernia in Pregnancy and Gastric Herniation and Ischaemia.

Irish medical journal·2025
Same author

The preventive effects of diosmin alone or combined with irinotecan on 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colon cancer in rats.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2024
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Surgical wound closure techniques
  • Orthopedic surgery
  • Hand surgery

Background:

  • Carpal tunnel decompression is a common surgical procedure.
  • Wound closure is a critical step in surgical recovery.
  • Suture material choice can impact patient outcomes and healing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare patient-reported pain and wound inflammation between absorbable and non-absorbable sutures for carpal tunnel decompression.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of polyglactin 910 versus polypropylene for elective carpal tunnel surgery wound closure.

Main Methods:

  • Randomised prospective clinical study design.
  • Comparison of subcuticular 4:0 polyglactin 910 (absorbable) and 5:0 monofilament polypropylene (non-absorbable) sutures.
  • Assessment of patient-reported pain perception and clinical evaluation of wound inflammation at 6 weeks post-surgery.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Patients undergoing wound closure with polypropylene (Prolene) reported increased pain perception.
  • A higher level of residual wound inflammation was observed in the polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) group at the 6-week assessment.

Conclusions:

  • Non-absorbable polypropylene sutures may lead to greater post-operative pain in carpal tunnel decompression.
  • Absorbable polyglactin 910 sutures might be associated with increased wound inflammation, requiring further investigation.
  • Suture selection for carpal tunnel surgery requires balancing pain, inflammation, and healing outcomes.