Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How to write a peer review.

E Paice1

  • 1Thames Postgraduate Medical and Dental Education, 33 Millman Street, London WC1N 3EJ.

Hospital Medicine (London, England : 1998)
|April 9, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Becoming a top-tier peer reviewer enhances scientific publication quality. This guide offers essential strategies for effective manuscript evaluation, ensuring reliable research dissemination.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stress, burnout and doctors' attitudes to work are determined by personality and learning style: a twelve year longitudinal study of UK medical graduates.

BMC medicine·2004
Same author

Informed consent and the preregistration house officer.

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2002
Same author

The effect of 1-year rotations on stress in preregistration house officers.

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2001
Same author

Job sharing in medical training: an evaluation of a 3-year project.

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2000
Same author

Trainee satisfaction before and after the Calman reforms of specialist training: questionnaire survey.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·2000
Same author

Flexible specialist training compared with full-time training.

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·1999
Same journal

Bisphosphonates' use in metastatic bone disease.

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2005
Same journal

What do specialist registrars know about clinical governance?

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2005
Same journal

Management of craniofacial abnormalities.

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2005
Same journal

Osteoporosis and hypogonadism in men.

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2005
Same journal

Time to hand over our old way of working?

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2005
Same journal

Pelvic fractures and high energy traumas.

Hospital medicine (London, England : 1998)·2005
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Scientific Publishing
  • Scholarly Communication

Background:

  • Peer review is crucial for scientific publication quality control.
  • Effective peer review supports journal improvement and reader protection.
  • Ineffective peer review can hinder scientific innovation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guidance on becoming a first-rate peer reviewer.
  • To outline best practices for manuscript evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • This article offers practical advice and strategies for peer reviewers.
  • Focuses on the qualitative aspects of manuscript assessment.

Main Results:

  • Readers are protected from erroneous or redundant literature.
  • Editors can improve journal standards through constructive feedback.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Innovation in science is facilitated by rigorous, fair review.

    • Conclusions:

    • Mastering peer review is essential for scientific integrity.
    • Adhering to best practices ensures high-quality scholarly communication.