Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2026

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
Published on: September 12, 2014
Relation between confidence in yes-no and forced-choice tasks
C R McKenzie1, J T Wixted, D C Noelle
1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego 92093-0109, USA. cmckenzie@ucsd.edu
Abstract:
Yes-no and forced-choice tasks are common in psychology, but the empirical relation between reported confidence in the 2 tasks has been unclear. The authors examined this relation with 2 experiments. The general experimental method had participants first report confidence in the truth of each of many general knowledge statements (a yes-no task) then report confidence in them again when the statements were put into pairs where it was known that one statement was true and one was false (a forced-choice task). At issue was how confidence in the statements changed between the yes-no task and the forced-choice task. Two models, including the normative one, were ruled out as descriptive models. A linear model and a multiplicative model remain viable contenders.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Confirmation Biases
Confidence Intervals
A confidence...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Confidence Coefficient
Motivational Bias

