[Managing adolescent and adult victims of extra-familial rape soon after aggression]

Rape victims often experience severe and prolonged symptoms in the aftermath of the assault. Psychological assistance offered rapidly after the assault should mitigate the intensity and moderate the duration of rape-related problems. This paper tried to identify the widely-accepted therapeutic approaches from a review of the current literature; it has its roots in the clinical experience acquired by our mobile crisis service in this type of situation, too. The goal of the following practices concerning the victim and the victim's immediate family is to assist the victim to reclaim control as quickly as possible over what has happened and to return to a normal functioning. The therapist should adopt an empathetic attitude, actively and instructively, even more so, and in an even more flexible way than for other patients. Knowledge of one's potential reactions to that kind of situation is useful since the counter-transference is here particularly intense. Doubting the patient's word is part of these negative reactions and must be avoided. It is better to respect the victim's feelings of guilt in the first instance. The relating of the facts, despite its cathartic value, should not be imposed on the patient. It should be noted that these last two points are controversial. It is also important to give information, during interviews, about the symptoms which can occur, the defence mechanisms that the individual sets up for just such occasions and on the most common difficulties encountered in personal relationships. In particular, the therapist must verify that concrete measures are taken to protect the victim against another attack. As far as the immediate family is concerned, it seems particularly important to involve them and, better still, meet them. Their reaction to the rape has a determining influence on the victim's capacity to cope with the trauma and its consequences. On the one hand, the immediate family should be helped in giving support to the victim by telling them all the details of what the patient could suffer, their potential reaction towards the victim and the victim's potential reactions towards them. The question of security must also be brought up with the family, in particular the risk of suicide which can be great. On the other hand, it is important to meet the family to give them support because they too may have difficulty in coming to terms with the violence of the aggression and its consequences. These approaches are up to now the only guidelines available since no psychotherapeutic technique (based on controlled studies) has proved to be more efficient than another and since the clinical experience of the authors are leading them to opposite therapeutic options. Different psychotherapeutic techniques are recommended: short therapies such as cognitive-behavioural therapies or hypnosis, or longer ones such as psychoanalytic psychotherapy. Several of these different options, to which must be added physical techniques like relaxation and medication, are often used simultaneously and/or in succession. As for drug treatments no controlled study conducted with this population has proved their efficiency on post-traumatic stress disorder. According to us they are essentially useful in order to diminish the intensity of the symptoms of anxiety.