Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Viewpoint dependence in visual and haptic object recognition.

F N Newell1, M O Ernst, B S Tjan

  • 1University of Durham, England. fnewell@tcd.ie

Psychological Science
|April 11, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Generalisation to novel exemplars of learned shape categories based on visual and auditory spatial cues does not benefit from multisensory information.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2024
Same author

Multisensory perception constrains the formation of object categories: a review of evidence from sensory-driven and predictive processes on categorical decisions.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2023
Same author

Older adults with slow sit to stand times show reduced temporal precision of audio-visual integration.

Experimental brain research·2023
Same author

Effects of invisible lip movements on phonetic perception.

Scientific reports·2023
Same author

Self-reported vividness of tactile imagery for object properties and body regions: An exploratory study.

Consciousness and cognition·2022
Same author

The rubber hand illusion is influenced by self-recognition.

Neuroscience letters·2020
Same journal

A Field Experiment Testing Whether Accountability Reduces Racial Gaps in Performance Evaluations.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Testosterone Affect Cognitive Reflection? Evidence From a Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Study of 1,000 Participants.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Does Overconfidence Really Confer Adaptive Benefits to Children's Learning?

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

How Does the Mind Grow? Cross-Cultural Intuitive Theories of Mental Development.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Not All Practice Is Created Equal: Longitudinal Evidence From Over 40,000 Chess Players.

Psychological science·2026
Same journal

Eye Glint as a Novel Perceptual Cue in Human Vision.

Psychological science·2026
See all related articles

Object recognition is viewpoint-specific for both vision and touch. Unexpectedly, haptic recognition favors the back view, unlike visual recognition which prefers the front view.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • Object recognition is typically best from familiar viewpoints.
  • Previous research suggests visual recognition is viewpoint-dependent.
  • The influence of viewpoint on haptic object recognition, especially with unrestricted movement, is less understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether haptic object recognition is also viewpoint-specific.
  • To explore the preferred viewpoint for haptic object recognition.
  • To examine cross-modal effects in object recognition when visual and haptic learning/recognition modalities differ.

Main Methods:

  • Participants learned and recognized objects using either visual or haptic input.
  • Object viewpoints were systematically varied during learning and recognition phases.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Hand movements were unrestricted during haptic exploration.
  • Recognition accuracy was measured across different viewpoints and sensory modalities.

    • Main Results:

    • Haptic object recognition was found to be significantly viewpoint-specific, contrary to expectations.
    • Hands showed a preference for recognizing objects from their posterior (back) aspects.
    • When sensory modalities differed between learning and recognition (e.g., learning visually, recognizing haptically), performance was optimal if objects were rotated 180 degrees (back-to-front).

    Conclusions:

    • Both visual and haptic object recognition exhibit viewpoint specificity.
    • The human hand preferentially recognizes objects from the back, contrasting with the visual system's preference for the front.
    • Cross-modal object recognition is influenced by viewpoint and preferred sensory orientations.