Early clinical trials of chemopreventive and biologic agents: Designs, populations, and endpoints

P Keegan1, B E Loughman

  • 1Division of Clinical Trials Design and Analysis, Office of Therapeutics, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20852-1445, USA. keegan@cber.fda.gov

Urology
|April 11, 2001
PubMed

Insights

Designing cancer chemoprevention trials requires careful consideration of drug mechanisms and available assays. A flexible approach is needed due to diverse agents and targets, as illustrated by R-flurbiprofen for prostate cancer.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Pharmacology
  • Drug Development

Background:

  • Optimal design for early-phase cancer chemoprevention trials remains undefined.
  • Heterogeneity of chemopreventive agents and their targeted biological effects necessitates tailored trial designs.
  • Key design factors include proposed mechanisms of action, assay availability for pharmacodynamic effects, and prior clinical experience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss critical factors for designing initial clinical trials of cancer chemopreventive agents.
  • To present a case study of early clinical assessment for a specific chemopreventive agent.

Main Methods:

  • Review of factors influencing the design of early clinical activity studies for chemopreventive agents.
  • Detailed examination of the early clinical assessment of R-flurbiprofen (E-7869), a non-cytotoxic agent, for prostate cancer chemoprevention.

Main Results:

  • Identified key considerations for designing chemoprevention trials, including drug mechanism, pharmacodynamic assays, and clinical experience.
  • Demonstrated the application of these considerations through the assessment of R-flurbiprofen for prostate cancer.

Conclusions:

  • A one-size-fits-all trial design is unsuitable for cancer chemoprevention due to drug and target variability.
  • A comprehensive approach considering drug properties and assay capabilities is essential for effective early-phase chemoprevention trials.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
Preclinical Development: Overview01:28

Preclinical Development: Overview

Preclinical development consists of a series of tests that ensure the safety and efficacy of a new therapeutic compound before it is tested in humans. There are four main phases to this process. First, safety pharmacology tests are conducted to ensure the drug does not produce any acutely harmful effects. These tests examine parameters such as bronchoconstriction, cardiac dysrhythmias, blood pressure changes, and ataxia. Next, preliminary toxicological testing is performed to determine the...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...