Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Confidentiality.

L Gillam1, J M Little

  • 1Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Murdoch Institute, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville.

The Medical Journal of Australia
|April 12, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Vascular Amputees: A Study in Disappointment.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2022
Same author

Reflecting Before, During, and After the Heat of the Moment: A Review of Four Approaches for Supporting Health Staff to Manage Stressful Events.

Journal of bioethical inquiry·2021
Same author

Public attitudes towards novel reproductive technologies: a citizens' jury on mitochondrial donation.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2019
Same author

Electron Cooling in a Magnetically Expanding Plasma.

Physical review letters·2016
Same author

Estimating ON and OFF contributions to the photopic hill: normative data and clinical applications.

Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology·2014
Same author

What parents want from doctors in end-of-life decision-making for children.

Archives of disease in childhood·2013
Same journal

Drivers of Vaccine Uptake for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children to Inform Tailored Strategies: A Qualitative Study Exploring Health Service Provider Perspective.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Four Urgent Actions for the Rights to Culturally Safe Breastfeeding for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mothers and Babies to Breastfeed in Neonatal Intensive Care Environments.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Intergenerational Child Protection Contact and Child Development Outcomes: A Whole Population Linked Data Study.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Treatment and Survival Outcomes for Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Australians Within the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Cohort Study.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Worsening Asthma Outcomes in Australian Adults: A Comparison of Stratified Sample Surveys in 2012 and 2021.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
Same journal

Stigmatising Attitudes Towards People With Depression, Bipolar Disorder, Borderline Personality, ADHD and Early and Long-Term/Untreated Schizophrenia: Representative Survey of Australian Adults.

The Medical journal of Australia·2026
See all related articles

Navigating patient confidentiality requires careful consideration of complex relationships and sensitive information. Doctors should consult experienced colleagues when facing difficult ethical decisions regarding confidential data.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Patient Confidentiality
  • Healthcare Law

Background:

  • Confidentiality is a cornerstone of the patient-physician relationship.
  • Complex relationships and sensitive information create challenges in maintaining confidentiality.
  • Existing guidelines may not offer straightforward solutions for all ethical dilemmas.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the complexities of patient confidentiality in medical practice.
  • To provide guidance for healthcare professionals facing ethical challenges related to sensitive information.
  • To emphasize the importance of careful deliberation and collegial consultation.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of ethical case studies.
  • Review of relevant medical ethics literature.
Keywords:
Legal ApproachProfessional Patient Relationship

Related Experiment Videos

  • Expert opinion synthesis on confidentiality dilemmas.

    • Main Results:

    • Decisions regarding confidentiality are often nuanced and context-dependent.
    • No universal solutions exist for all confidentiality issues.
    • The process requires thorough ethical reasoning and consideration of all involved parties.

    Conclusions:

    • Healthcare professionals must carefully weigh competing interests in confidentiality cases.
    • Consultation with experienced colleagues is crucial for navigating difficult ethical decisions.
    • Empathy and shared decision-making can aid in resolving complex confidentiality issues.