Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A two-stage model for visual-auditory interaction in saccadic latencies.

H Colonius1, P Arndt

  • 1Institut für Kognitionsforschung, University of Oldenburg, Germany. hans.colonius@uni-oldenburg.de

Perception & Psychophysics
|April 17, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Mycotic aortic aneurysm-Representative cases : Case series of clinical case examples and the current literature on the treatment options of open surgical resection with prosthesis implantation (OR) and endovascular aortic repair (EVAR)].

Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)·2025
Same author

Dehydropolymerisation of methylamine borane using a dinuclear 1,3-allenediyl bridged zirconocene complex.

Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)·2018
Same author

Artificial urine and FBS supplemented media in cytocompatibility assays for PLGA-PEG-based intravesical devices using the urothelium cell line UROtsa.

Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials·2017
Same author

Fechnerian metrics in unidimensional and multidimensional stimulus spaces.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Interaction of cations, anions, and weak base quinine with rat renal cation transporter rOCT2 compared with rOCT1.

American journal of physiology. Renal physiology·2001
Same author

Countermanding saccades with auditory stop signals: testing the race model.

Vision research·2001

Auditory distractors slow down visual saccadic response time (SRT), especially when further away or presented later. This study models how visual and auditory information are processed and integrated.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human-Computer Interaction

Background:

  • Saccadic response time (SRT) is crucial for visual attention.
  • Multisensory integration influences reaction times.
  • Auditory distractors can impact visual processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effect of auditory distractor location and timing on visual SRT.
  • To develop and test a stochastic model of multisensory processing.

Main Methods:

  • Measured SRT to visual targets with simultaneous/near-simultaneous auditory distractors.
  • Varied horizontal position and onset timing of auditory stimuli in a virtual environment.
  • Applied a stochastic model with peripheral and central processing stages.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Mean SRT increased with greater distance between visual target and auditory distractor.
  • Delayed auditory onset relative to visual stimulus also increased SRT.
  • Model successfully tested two versions concerning auditory distractor roles.

Conclusions:

  • Auditory distractors significantly modulate visual saccadic eye movements.
  • Intersensory integration plays a key role in processing simultaneous stimuli.
  • The proposed model offers insights into multisensory processing dynamics.