Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

Experimental Methods to Study Human Postural Control
Published on: September 11, 2019
Effects of supine body position and low radial accelerations on the visually perceived apparent zenith
C Raphel1, C Cian, P A Barraud
1Centre de Recherches du Service de Santé des Armées, La Tronche, France. raphelchristian@compuserve.com
Abstract:
The visually perceived eye level (VPEL) has been shown to shift toward the lower part of the body in upright subjects facing toward the axis of rotation on a centrifuge. This shift occurs in the same direction as the shift in the gravito-inertial forces (Gis) produced by very low radial acceleration (centrifugation) combined with gravity. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the same phenomenon affects the visually perceived apparent zenith (VPAZ) in subjects in a supine position. Twelve supine subjects were instructed to set a luminous target to the VPAZ, either while they were in total darkness and motionless or while undergoing very low centrifugation. Data showed that Gis induced a VPAZ shift similar to that observed for the VPEL. Thus, as is the case for the VPEL, the corresponding logarithmic psychophysical function of the VPAZ may be considered to be a type of oculogravic illusion phenomenon with differences in the subjects' that differs from subject to subject, depending on the subject's sensitivity to low radial accelerations. Data on VPEL and VPAZ support the notion that the subjective perception of eye level in total darkness takes into account changes--even if extremely slight-in the direction of the gravito-inertial forces produced by the combination of gravity and low radial accelerations, although subjects are unaware of the Gi shift. However, depending on the intensity of the radial acceleration and the angular deviation of Gi relative to G, the shift of the VPEL and the VPAZ can be either amplified or attenuated. Moreover, differences between VPEL and VPAZ responses suggest two explanatory assumptions--namely, that this is (1) a peripheral phenomenon dependent on the neurophysiological anisotropy of the otolithic system or (2) a central phenomenon dependent on the relevance assigned to the peripheral information by the integrative sensory functions and the associative processes.
More Related Videos
06:30Assessment of Static Graviceptive Perception in the Roll-Plane using the Subjective Visual Vertical Paradigm
Published on: April 28, 2020
07:24Using Eye-tracking to Assess the Relative Importance of Visual and Vestibular Input to Subcortical Motion Processing in the Roll Plane
Published on: August 22, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Variation in Acceleration due to Gravity near the Earth's Surface
The difference between the true and apparent weights is proportional to the square of the Earth's angular speed. Since the...
Anatomical Positions
The body is upright, facing forward, and standing erect.
The feet are parallel and flat on the floor.
The arms are hanging by the...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes - Acceleration
Time differentiation is...
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision
Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling