Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Medical observations and bias.

O Horwitz, B Lysgaard-Hansen

    American Journal of Epidemiology
    |May 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary

    This study introduces a calibration method for diverse physician readings in clinical and epidemiologic studies. It ensures data reliability by defining acceptable deviation ranges and addressing potential biases for accurate statistical analysis.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    ADVANCES IN THE PHARMACOLOGY OF DISEASES OF THE PERIPHERAL VASCULAR SYSTEM.

    A listing of research in the cardiovascular field·2014
    Same author

    The Relationship of the Degree of Lipemia to the Blood Cells and Oxygen Tension of the Tissues of the Legs.

    Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association·2011
    Same author

    A case of large overdose of epinephrine.

    American heart journal·2010
    Same author

    Heparin for oral use: preliminary studies.

    Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association·1992
    Same author

    Francis Clark Wood.

    Transactions of the American Clinical and Climatological Association·1992
    Same author

    Arterial intimal embrittlement. A possible factor in atherogenesis.

    Atherosclerosis·1986

    Area of Science:

    • Medical research methodology
    • Epidemiologic study design
    • Clinical data analysis

    Background:

    • Clinical and epidemiologic studies often rely on readings from multiple physicians, introducing potential variability.
    • Lack of standardized calibration can compromise the reliability and comparability of study results.
    • Systematic errors in basic data can invalidate statistical tests, leading to distorted findings.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To describe a method for calibrating examinations performed by different physicians.
    • To establish criteria for a standard reader to ensure consistency and reproducibility.
    • To highlight the impact of bias on the quantitative significance of epidemiologic studies.

    Main Methods:

    • Plotting a standard reader's results against other physicians' readings in a correlation diagram.
    • Characterizing reader performance using frequency of agreement, average difference in size, and variance.
    • Defining acceptable ranges of deviation from the standard reader for each study.

    Main Results:

    • A standard reader must demonstrate consistency (high agreement, small difference/variance in repeated readings) and reproducibility (agreement with other experienced physicians).
    • The study emphasizes the critical need to identify and account for systematic errors before applying statistical tests.
    • Examples illustrate that bias in epidemiologic studies can have considerable quantitative significance.

    Conclusions:

    • Implementing a standardized calibration method enhances the reliability of multi-reader studies.
    • Careful consideration of reader variability and potential biases is crucial for valid scientific conclusions.
    • Accurate calibration and bias assessment are essential for robust epidemiologic research.

    Related Experiment Videos