Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intergenerational and international discounting.

T C Schelling1

  • 1School of Public Affairs, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA. ts57@umail.umd.edu

Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
|April 21, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global warming and health effects in the Third World.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1995
Same author

Do businesses comply with a no-smoking law? Assessing the self-enforcement approach.

Preventive medicine·1994
Same author

Workplace compliance with a no-smoking law: a randomized community intervention trial.

American journal of public health·1992
Same author

Addictive drugs: the cigarette experience.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1992
Same author

Economics and cigarettes.

Preventive medicine·1986
Same author

Standards for adequate minimum personal health services.

The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly. Health and society·1979

Discount rates for future generations are complex. Greenhouse gas abatement costs are borne by developed nations, while benefits accrue to developing ones, reframing the issue as foreign aid.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental economics
  • Intergenerational equity
  • Climate change policy

Background:

  • Discount rates typically combine pure time preference and declining marginal utility.
  • Greenhouse gas abatement costs and benefits are unevenly distributed across generations and nations.
  • Current discount rate models may not adequately address intergenerational transfers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the application of discount rates for future generations in the context of climate change.
  • To analyze the distributional implications of greenhouse gas abatement policies.
  • To question the relevance of pure time preference in intergenerational consumption decisions.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of discount rate components.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Economic modeling of intergenerational resource allocation.
  • Comparative analysis of climate aid versus direct foreign aid.

    • Main Results:

    • Pure time preference is irrelevant for intergenerational consumption when transfers are from richer to poorer.
    • Greenhouse gas abatement costs borne by developed nations benefit future, poorer populations.
    • Consumption transfers over time exhibit declining marginal utility for recipients.

    Conclusions:

    • Intergenerational climate abatement should be viewed as a foreign aid program.
    • Climate aid must compete with direct foreign aid for effectiveness.
    • Policies should prioritize direct benefits to the currently poor over future, wealthier descendants.