Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Dual screening.

W O Johnson1, L M Pearson

  • 1Division of Statistics, University of California at Davis, 95616, USA. wojohnson@ucdavis.edu

Biometrics
|April 21, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces Bayesian and maximum-likelihood methods for population screening, like for HIV or drug use. These approaches accurately estimate disease prevalence even with limited initial data.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimating the herd and cow level prevalence of bovine digital dermatitis on New Zealand dairy farms: A Bayesian superpopulation approach.

Preventive veterinary medicine·2019
Same author

Development and validation of a 3ABC antibody ELISA in Australia for foot and mouth disease.

Australian veterinary journal·2014
Same author

Herd-level prevalence of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis infection in United States dairy herds in 2007.

Preventive veterinary medicine·2012
Same author

A framework for the joint modeling of longitudinal diagnostic outcome data and latent infection status: application to investigating the temporal relationship between infection and disease.

Biometrics·2011
Same author

Symposium on the menopause.

Kentucky medical journal·2010
Same author

Menopause from the viewpoint of the gynecologist.

Kentucky medical journal·2010
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Population screening for health characteristics (e.g., HIV, drug use) presents statistical challenges.
  • Accurate estimation of prevalence and test sensitivity is crucial for effective public health interventions.
  • Existing methods may struggle when initial data lacks information on screening test sensitivity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop robust statistical methods for general population screening.
  • To address the challenge of estimating prevalence when test sensitivity is unknown.
  • To provide flexible inference techniques applicable to various screening scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Bayesian inference incorporating prior information.
  • Gibbs sampling techniques for straightforward computation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Maximum-likelihood estimation using the Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed Bayesian approach provides valid inferences for any sample size, prevalence, or test accuracy.
    • The methods can estimate prevalence even when screening test sensitivity is not initially known from the data.
    • Both Bayesian and EM-based maximum-likelihood approaches are presented.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed statistical frameworks offer reliable solutions for population screening challenges.
    • These methods enhance the ability to accurately determine disease prevalence in general populations.
    • The techniques are adaptable and applicable across diverse public health screening contexts.