Related Experiment Videos
Just teasing: a conceptual analysis and empirical review.
D Keltner1, L Capps, A M Kring
1Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley 94720-1650, USA. keltner@socrates.berkeley.edu
Psychological Bulletin
|April 24, 2001
Summary
This study defines teasing as playful provocation, exploring its developmental, social, and cultural variations. Findings reveal teasing
Area of Science:
- Social Psychology
- Developmental Psychology
- Sociolinguistics
Background:
- Teasing is a complex social behavior with diverse manifestations and unclear definitions.
- Existing research lacks a unified framework to understand teasing's nuances and outcomes.
- Sociological concepts like "face" and "strategic interaction" offer potential for a clearer definition.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define teasing using E. Goffman's theories of face and strategic interaction.
- To differentiate teasing from related social practices.
- To explore factors influencing teasing, including developmental, social, and cultural contexts.
Main Methods:
- Conceptual analysis integrating sociological theories with existing empirical studies on teasing.
- Review and synthesis of research on the content, triggers, and developmental trajectory of teasing.
- Examination of contextual factors influencing teasing frequency and hostility.
Main Results:
- Teasing is defined as a playful provocation commenting on a target's relevant attributes.
- Norm violations and conflict are identified as common triggers for teasing.
- Teasing becomes more playful and understood with age, particularly around 11-12 years.
- Teasing is more frequent and hostile when initiated by high-status, familiar individuals, and men.
Conclusions:
- The proposed definition clarifies teasing and its potential for affiliative or hostile outcomes.
- Developmental and social factors significantly shape the nature and perception of teasing.
- Individual differences and cultural norms further modulate teasing behaviors.