Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response-effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks.

W Kunde1

  • 1Psychologisches Institut III, University of Würzburg, Germany. kunde@psychologie.uni-wuerzburg.de

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance
|April 25, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global-local orientation congruency effects in visual search.

The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology·2000
See all related articles

Anticipated sensory effects of actions, like visual or auditory feedback, influence our performance in manual choice reaction tasks. This suggests our brain predicts outcomes, impacting response selection based on response-effect compatibility.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Manual choice reaction tasks are fundamental for understanding human performance.
  • Response-effect compatibility, the relationship between an action and its sensory outcome, is a key factor in task performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of response-effect compatibility on manual choice reaction tasks.
  • To determine if sensory feedback congruence affects performance.
  • To test the role of ideomotor theory in response selection.

Main Methods:

  • Three experiments were conducted using manual choice reaction tasks.
  • Varied stimulus attributes (color), response characteristics (location, force), and effect modalities (visual, auditory).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ruled out stimulus-effect associations as an explanation for observed effects.

    • Main Results:

    • Response selection was significantly influenced by the compatibility between responses and their sensory effects.
    • Congruence in location (visual effects) and intensity (auditory effects) improved performance.
    • Acquired stimulus-effect associations did not account for the observed compatibility effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Anticipated sensory consequences of actions play a crucial role in response selection.
    • Findings support the classical ideomotor theory, where predicted effects guide motor behavior.
    • The brain appears to process forthcoming response effects as if they were already sensorially present.