Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Estimating "safe" levels, a hazardous undertaking.

N Mantel, M A Schneiderman

    Cancer Research
    |June 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Identifying chemical carcinogens and setting safe exposure levels face challenges. Applying consistent risk assessment methods, like the Mantel-Bryan approach, encourages thorough carcinogen testing and avoids double standards.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Genetic stability of a dengue vaccine based on chimeric yellow fever/dengue viruses.

    Vaccine·2011
    Same author

    Eradication of leukaemic cells (L1210) by methotrexate and methotrexate plus citrovorum factor.

    Nature·2010
    Same author

    Standardized quantitative RT-PCR assays for quantitation of yellow fever and chimeric yellow fever-dengue vaccines.

    Journal of virological methods·2008
    Same author

    Chemotherapy and surgery of spontaneous tumors of mice. 1966.

    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)·2004
    Same author

    The efficiency of the sets and the cuscore techniques under biased baseline rates.

    Statistics in medicine·1997
    Same author

    Motor neuron disease on Guam: geographic and familial occurrence, 1956-85.

    Acta neurologica Scandinavica·1996
    Same journal

    CDK2 Inhibition Exerts RB-Independent Antitumor Activity in CDK4/6 Inhibitor-Resistant HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer.

    Cancer research·2026
    Same journal

    A Clinically Integrated Pediatric Patient-Derived Xenograft Program Enables Evaluation of Cohort and Patient-Specific Biology and Therapeutic Strategies.

    Cancer research·2026
    Same journal

    Editor's Note: Heterodimerization of Insulin-like Growth Factor Receptor/Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor and Induction of Survivin Expression Counteract the Antitumor Action of Erlotinib.

    Cancer research·2026
    Same journal

    Editor's Note: Deguelin Analogue SH-1242 Inhibits Hsp90 Activity and Exerts Potent Anticancer Efficacy with Limited Neurotoxicity.

    Cancer research·2026
    Same journal

    Retraction: Two Functional Epitopes of Pigment Epithelial-Derived Factor Block Angiogenesis and Induce Differentiation in Prostate Cancer.

    Cancer research·2026
    Same journal

    Editor's Note: Chronic Stress Facilitates Lung Tumorigenesis by Promoting Exocytosis of IGF2 in Lung Epithelial Cells.

    Cancer research·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Environmental Health
    • Toxicology
    • Risk Assessment

    Background:

    • Identifying environmental carcinogens and setting permissible exposure levels presents significant challenges.
    • Current approaches often involve a 'double standard,' applying stricter regulations with stronger evidence, potentially discouraging thorough testing.
    • Issues include cost-benefit analysis, threshold determination, experimental design, and interspecies extrapolation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To address the complexities in identifying chemical carcinogens and establishing safe exposure limits.
    • To advocate for even-handed risk assessment methodologies to encourage comprehensive carcinogen testing.
    • To discuss optimal laboratory testing strategies and interspecies dose extrapolation.

    Main Methods:

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of existing methodologies for carcinogen identification and risk assessment.
  • Analysis of the implications of 'double standard' approaches in regulatory science.
  • Proposal of consistent risk assessment frameworks, such as the Mantel-Bryan method.
  • Discussion of laboratory animal testing protocols, including dose levels and extrapolation methods.

    • Main Results:

    • Double standards in carcinogen regulation may inadvertently discourage rigorous testing.
    • Consistent application of risk assessment tools can promote more adequate testing.
    • High or moderate dose testing in laboratory animals is often more informative than low-dose 'mega-mouse' studies.
    • A surface-area rule for extrapolating animal to human doses suggests approximate equivalence when expressed as dietary concentrations.

    Conclusions:

    • Even-handed risk assessment is crucial for effective carcinogen identification and regulation.
    • Optimizing laboratory testing designs and extrapolation methods is essential for accurate human health risk assessment.
    • The proposed approach encourages robust scientific inquiry into chemical carcinogenicity.