Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Reduced sensitivity to hidden bias at upper quantiles in observational studies with dilated treatment effects
1Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 19104-6302, USA. rosenbaum@stat.wharton.upenn.edu
Abstract:
When a treatment has a dilated effect, with larger effects when responses are higher, there can be much less sensitivity to bias at upper quantiles than at lower quantiles; i.e., small, plausible hidden biases might explain the ostensible effect of the treatment for many subjects, and yet only quite large hidden biases could explain the effect on a few subjects having dramatically elevated responses. An example concerning kidney function of cadmium workers is discussed in detail. In that example, the treatment effect is far from additive: It is plausibly zero at the lower quartile of responses to control, and it is large and fairly insensitive to bias at the upper quartile.
Related Concept Videos
Blind Procedures
Regression Toward the Mean
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Blinding
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Halo Effect