Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Predictive margins with survey data.

B I Graubard1, E L Korn

  • 1Biostatistics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA. BG1P@NIH.GOV

Biometrics
|April 25, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of the contribution of randomised cancer clinical trials evaluating agents without documented single-agent activity.

ESMO open·2020
Same author

Associations between circulating sex steroid hormones and leukocyte telomere length in men in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Andrology·2018
Same author

Interim monitoring for non-inferiority trials: minimizing patient exposure to inferior therapies.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2017
Same author

Prevalence of myeloma precursor state monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in 12372 individuals 10-49 years old: a population-based study from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

Blood cancer journal·2017
Same author

Assessing treatment efficacy in the subset of responders in a randomized clinical trial.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2017
Same author

Marijuana use and serum testosterone concentrations among U.S. males.

Andrology·2017
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

Predictive margins generalize adjusted means for nonlinear models, offering insights into group outcomes. Careful selection of covariate distributions is crucial when applying predictive margins to complex survey data.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Adjusted treatment means in ANCOVA enable group comparisons by controlling for covariates.
  • Predictive margins extend adjusted means to nonlinear models, representing average outcomes if all were in a specific group.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the application of predictive margins with complex survey data.
  • To highlight the importance of covariate distribution choice for standardizing predictive margins.
  • To evaluate the appropriateness of standard error formulas for adjusted means in survey data analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Generalization of Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) adjusted means to nonlinear models using predictive margins.
  • Application of predictive margins to complex survey data, considering standardization via covariate distributions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of standard error calculation for adjusted treatment means in the context of survey data.

    • Main Results:

    • Predictive margins serve as a valuable tool for comparing group outcomes in nonlinear models.
    • The choice of covariate distribution for standardization is a critical consideration for predictive margins with survey data.
    • Standard textbook formulas for adjusted means' standard errors may not be suitable for complex survey data.

    Conclusions:

    • Predictive margins are a powerful extension of adjusted means for nonlinear statistical models.
    • Methodological considerations, particularly covariate standardization, are essential when using predictive margins with complex survey data.
    • Further research may be needed to refine standard error estimation for adjusted means in survey data analysis.