Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems.

E Samei1, J A Seibert, C E Willis

  • 1Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. samei@duke.edu

Medical Physics
|April 25, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Proton therapy range uncertainty reduction using vendor-agnostic tissue characterization on a virtual photon-counting CT head scan.

ArXiv·2026
Same author

Panlobular emphysema is associated with COPD disease severity: A study of emphysema subtype by computed tomography.

Respiratory medicine·2022
Same author

Cell and extracellular matrix growth theory and its implications for tumorigenesis.

Bio Systems·2020
Same author

Planned combined onco-plastic (COP) surgical approach improves oncologic outcomes in soft tissue sarcomas.

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology·2020
Same author

[Diaper rash and associated risk factors in infants at the Yaounde Gynaeco-obstetric and Pediatric Hospital, Cameroon].

Annales de dermatologie et de venereologie·2018
Same author

[Clinical and etiological aspects of focal epilepsy in children at Yaoundé Gynaeco-obstetric Hospital (Cameroon)].

Le Mali medical·2018
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

New guidelines from AAPM Task Group No. 10 offer standardized tests for computed radiography (CR) systems. These performance evaluations ensure optimal image quality and reliability for digital radiography devices in clinical settings.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiologic Technology
  • Diagnostic Imaging

Background:

  • Computed radiography (CR) systems are integral to modern digital radiography.
  • Standardized performance testing is crucial for ensuring diagnostic image quality and system reliability.
  • Existing testing protocols may lack uniformity and comprehensive evaluation metrics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize and clarify recommended performance testing methods for CR systems developed by AAPM Task Group No. 10.
  • To provide quantitative measures and uniform criteria for satisfactory CR device performance.
  • To validate the applicability of these criteria through clinical system testing.

Main Methods:

  • Review and tabular summarization of AAPM Task Group No. 10 recommended tests.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Delineation of technical aspects for each test, including dark noise, uniformity, and spatial resolution.
  • Application and verification of recommended quantitative performance criteria on CR systems across five institutions.

    • Main Results:

    • A comprehensive set of tests covering various aspects of CR system performance was detailed.
    • Quantitative measures and uniform acceptance criteria for satisfactory performance were proposed.
    • Clinical validation confirmed the applicability and utility of the recommended testing procedures.

    Conclusions:

    • The AAPM Task Group No. 10 recommendations provide a robust framework for CR system acceptance and routine testing.
    • Standardized testing ensures consistent performance and reliable diagnostic imaging.
    • Further clarification on beam filtration and automatic exposure control calibration enhances the practical implementation of the recommendations.