Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is peak height sufficient?

D Siegmund1

  • 1Department of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-4065. dos@stat.stanford.edu

Genetic Epidemiology
|April 25, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Genome scans can gain power by considering peak width and height, but only if smoothing enhances marker informativeness. For fully informative markers, smoothing offers questionable benefits for genome scan power.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sulfur substitution in a Ni(cyclam) derivative results in lower overpotential for CO<sub>2</sub> reduction and enhanced proton reduction.

Dalton transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)·2019
Same author

CD70-restricted specific activation of TRAILR1 or TRAILR2 using scFv-targeted TRAIL mutants.

Cell death & disease·2014
Same author

CD40-directed scFv-TRAIL fusion proteins induce CD40-restricted tumor cell death and activate dendritic cells.

Cell death & disease·2013
Same author

TNFR1 and TNFR2 regulate the extrinsic apoptotic pathway in myeloma cells by multiple mechanisms.

Cell death & disease·2011
Same author

Mutant PIK3CA licenses TRAIL and CD95L to induce non-apoptotic caspase-8-mediated ROCK activation.

Cell death and differentiation·2010
Same author

TNF-like weak inducer of apoptosis inhibits proinflammatory TNF receptor-1 signaling.

Cell death and differentiation·2009
Same journal

Applying Bayesian Multivariable Mendelian Randomisation to Prioritise Candidate Causal Traits From High-Dimensional Data: Illustration From Estimation of the Effect of Maternal Metabolites on Offspring Birthweight.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Individualized Bayesian Inference Identifies Novel Genetic Variants for Parkinson's Disease.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

DRIVE v3: Command Line Application for Identity-by-Descent Haplotype Clustering in Large Biobank Scale Data.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Deep Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Translating Cancer Dependency Maps From Cell Lines to Breast Cancer Tumor Genomics.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Polygenic Risk Scores for Incident Dementia in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Outcome and Exposure Polygenic Risk Scores Can Help Reduce Information Bias and Selection Bias in Regression Estimates From Biobank Data.

Genetic epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • Genome scans are crucial for identifying genetic loci associated with traits.
  • The statistical power of genome scans is influenced by various factors, including how marker information is analyzed.
  • The utility of incorporating 'peak width' alongside 'peak height' in genome scan analysis remains a subject of debate.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the controversial suggestion that considering 'peak width' in genome scans can increase statistical power.
  • To evaluate the impact of smoothing techniques on the informativeness of genetic markers and overall genome scan power.
  • To determine the conditions under which smoothing provides benefits or is of limited value in genome scan analysis.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of genome scan data, focusing on the statistical properties of "peak height" and "peak width".
  • Evaluation of smoothing techniques applied to genetic marker data.
  • Assessment of statistical power in relation to marker informativeness and smoothing parameters.

    • Main Results:

    • Smoothing can enhance genome scan power by increasing the informativeness of individual genetic markers.
    • The benefit of smoothing is contingent upon its ability to improve marker informativeness.
    • For markers that are already fully informative, the application of smoothing yields questionable improvements in statistical power.

    Conclusions:

    • The effectiveness of smoothing in genome scan analysis is dependent on the informativeness of the genetic markers.
    • While smoothing can boost power when markers are not fully informative, its value diminishes for highly informative markers.
    • Careful consideration of marker informativeness is essential when deciding on the application of smoothing in genome scan studies.