Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evolution of cooperation through indirect reciprocity.

O Leimar1, P Hammerstein

  • 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, Sweden. olof.leimar@zool.su.se

Proceedings. Biological Sciences
|April 26, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Cooperation through indirect reciprocity can evolve via

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reproductive interference and fecundity affect competitive interactions of sibling species with low mating barriers: experimental and theoretical evidence.

Heredity·2017
Same author

Variation in two phases of post-winter development of a butterfly.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2014
Same author

Heterospecific courtship, minority effects and niche separation between cryptic butterfly species.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2013
Same author

Epidemiology in evolutionary time: the case of Wolbachia horizontal transmission between arthropod host species.

Journal of evolutionary biology·2012
Same author

A simple fitness proxy for structured populations with continuous traits, with case studies on the evolution of haplo-diploids and genetic dimorphisms.

Journal of biological dynamics·2012
Same author

Biological markets.

Trends in ecology & evolution·2011

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary biology
  • Game theory
  • Social behavior

Background:

  • Previous models of indirect reciprocity evolution assumed no gene flow, favoring 'image scoring' strategies.
  • Analytical arguments suggest image scoring is not individually rational.
  • A puzzle exists regarding the evolution and stability of indirect reciprocity strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the evolution of indirect reciprocity using an island model incorporating genetic drift.
  • To evaluate the robustness of 'image scoring' strategies under varying conditions.
  • To explore alternative strategies, such as 'good standing', for indirect reciprocity.

Main Methods:

  • Simulations based on an island model to examine genetic drift's role.
  • Analysis of 'image scoring' and 'good standing' strategies under different selection pressures.
  • Introduction of individual quality variation to assess strategy adaptiveness.

Main Results:

  • Image scoring strategies require strong genetic drift or minimal helping costs to persist.
  • Selection eliminates image scoring when these factors are absent.
  • 'Good standing' strategies demonstrate superior evolutionary properties and can be quality-revealing.

Conclusions:

  • Indirect reciprocity evolution is sensitive to population structure and evolutionary forces like drift.
  • 'Good standing' emerges as a more robust and potentially adaptive strategy for indirect reciprocity.
  • Quality variation can enhance the function of indirect reciprocity mechanisms.

Related Experiment Videos