Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2026

Stem Cell-Derived Viral Ag-Specific T Lymphocytes Suppress HBV Replication in Mice
Published on: September 25, 2019
Successful immune response to a recombinant hepatitis B vaccine in children after liver transplantation
P Duca1, J M Del Pont, D D'Agostino
1Liver Transplant Center, Department of Pediatrics, Hospital Italiano, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Insights
Hepatitis B recombinant vaccine (RV) showed good immunogenicity and safety in pediatric liver transplant recipients. Immunization was most effective in patients on cyclosporine monotherapy, achieving 85% seroconversion.
Area of Science:
- Hepatology
- Immunology
- Pediatric Transplantation
Background:
- Vaccination is crucial for liver transplant recipients.
- This study evaluates Hepatitis B recombinant vaccine (RV) in pediatric liver transplant (TxH) patients who did not receive pre-transplant vaccination.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the immunogenicity and safety of RV in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
- To evaluate the response to RV in patients with varying immunosuppression regimens.
Main Methods:
- 47 pediatric liver transplant patients vaccinated with RV (10 or 20 microg based on weight) on a 0, 1, and 6-month schedule.
- Non-responders received a booster dose; responders defined by HBs Ab enzyme immunoassay (EIA) titers.
- Immunosuppression regimens included monotherapy, double, or triple therapy with cyclosporine.
Main Results:
- 70% of patients responded to the initial RV doses; 50% of non-responders achieved seroconversion after a booster.
- Overall seroconversion rate was 85% with a low incidence of adverse effects (2.63%).
- Higher response rates were observed with cyclosporine monotherapy (100%) compared to triple immunosuppression (66%).
Conclusions:
- RV immunization is well-tolerated and safe in pediatric liver transplant recipients.
- Acceptable seroconversion rates were achieved, particularly in patients on cyclosporine monotherapy.
- This vaccination strategy shows promise for improving outcomes in immunosuppressed pediatric populations.
Background:
Patients who undergo liver transplantation require multifaceted general care, and vaccination has a fundamental role before and after transplantation. The purpose of this study was to provide a prospective evaluation of the immunogenicity of the recombinant vaccine (RV) against Hepatitis B in pediatric patients with liver transplants (TxH) who for different reasons did not receive a pretransplantation vaccine.
Methods:
From June 1996 to December 1999, 47 pediatric patients with liver transplants were vaccinated with RV. Patients older than 1 year of age, in stable condition, and 6 months post-transplantation were included. The vaccination scheme was 0-1 and 6 months, intramuscular 10 microg in less than 30 kg body weight, and 20 microg in more than 30 kg body weight. The nonresponder patients were vaccinated with a booster dose and a double dose 1 to 6 months after the last dose. Responders to titer HBs Ab enzyme immunoassay (EIA) <10 UI/ml were defined as nonresponders, to titer between 10-100 UI/ml as responders, and to higher titer of 100 UI/ml as high responders.
Results:
The following data were obtained from the 47 patients: mean +/- standard deviation (SD) age at vaccination was 10.76 +/- 5.96 years old and the mean +/- SD post-transplant time at the beginning of vaccination was 3.56 +/- 2.19 years. Thirty-three of 47 patients (70%) responded to doses according to body weight, and 14 (30%) did not respond, necessitating a booster dose after which 7 responded (50%). The global seroconversion was 85%. There was not a significant responder cyclosporine concentration dosage (154 vs. 150 ng/ml) difference between responders and nonresponders. Sixty-six percent (8 of 12) of patients receiving a triple immunosuppressive scheme (cyclosporine, steroids, and Azathioprine) had a positive response, while 84% (16 of 19) receiving a double scheme (cyclosporine and steroids) and 100% (16 of 16) receiving monotherapy with cyclosporine had a positive response. By comparing a triple scheme with monotherapy, the Fisher exact test found a P < 0.01. Incidence of adverse effects (local pain) was 2.63%.
Conclusion:
Immunization with RV was well-tolerated with acceptable seroconversion and safety in recipients after liver transplantation, particularly in those undergoing cyclosporine monotherapy. The population studied showed better results than did other populations of immunosuppressed patients.
Related Concept Videos
Cell-mediated Immune Responses
Tissue Transplantation
The Biology of Tissue Transplantation
The biology of tissue transplantation hinges on the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) molecules. These molecules...
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy the...
Vaccinations
Hepatitis
