Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Body composition estimates from multicomponent models using BIA to determine body water.

E M Evans1, S A Arngrimsson, K J Cureton

  • 1Department of Exercise Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-6554, USA. eevans@im.wustl.edu

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise
|April 27, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Metabolic and Circulatory Responses to Running During Pregnancy.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

Heart Rate and Energy Expenditure During Aqua Dynamics.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

Letters.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

The DeepTree Exhibit: Visualizing the Tree of Life to Facilitate Informal Learning.

IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics·2015
Same author

Impact of body mass index on the relationship between muscle quality and physical function in older women.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2014
Same author

Lifestyle intervention at sea changes body composition, metabolic profile and fitness.

Public health·2012

Estimates of body fat percentage using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) in multi-component models are not accurate enough to replace criterion methods like deuterium dilution (D2O). These BIA-derived body fat estimates are comparable to simpler two-component models but not ideal substitutes.

Area of Science:

  • Human Physiology
  • Body Composition Analysis
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Accurate body fat percentage (%BF) estimation is crucial for health assessment.
  • Multi-component models offer more detailed body composition analysis than two-component models.
  • Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a common, non-invasive method for estimating total body water (TBW) and body fat.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare body fat (%BF) estimates derived from three- and four-component models using BIA-determined TBW against criterion methods.
  • To evaluate the accuracy of %BF estimates from single-frequency BIA against densitometry and deuterium dilution (D2O) methods.

Main Methods:

  • Body density was measured using hydrostatic weighing.
  • Total body water (TBW) was determined by both single-frequency BIA and deuterium dilution (D2O).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Body fat percentage (%BF) was calculated using two-, three-, and four-component models, incorporating BIA and D2O measurements.

    • Main Results:

    • A strong correlation and no significant difference were found between TBW estimated by BIA and D2O.
    • Estimates of %BF from three- and four-component models using BIA showed strong correlations with criterion methods.
    • However, the accuracy of BIA-derived %BF in multi-component models was comparable to, or slightly worse than, the two-component densitometry model.

    Conclusions:

    • Multi-component models using BIA-derived TBW are not more accurate than the two-component densitometry model for estimating %BF.
    • Therefore, %BF estimates from multi-component models utilizing BIA-determined TBW are not acceptable substitutes for those using criterion TBW methods like D2O.