Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A guide to evaluating epidemiological studies.

T J Pallasch1

  • 1University of Southern California School of Dentistry, USA.

Journal of the New Jersey Dental Association
|April 28, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The focal infection theory: appraisal and reappraisal.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2001
Same author

A guide to evaluating epidemiological studies.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2001
Same author

Oral microorganisms and cardiovascular disease.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2001
Same author

Global antibiotic resistance and its impact on the dental community.

Journal of the California Dental Association·2001
Same author

Global antibiotic resistance and its impact on the dental community.

Journal of the New Jersey Dental Association·2001
Same author

The 1997 prevention of bacterial endocarditis recommendations by the American Heart Association: questions and answers.

Journal of the California Dental Association·1999
Same journal

Oral Pathology Quiz #94. Case Number 4. Fibroma.

Journal of the New Jersey Dental Association·2018
Same journal

Oral Pathology Quiz #94. Case Number 3. Epithelial dysplasia.

Journal of the New Jersey Dental Association·2018
Same journal

Oral Pathology Quiz #94. Case Number 2. Fibrous dysplasia.

Journal of the New Jersey Dental Association·2018
Same journal

Five Things to Know About Peri-Implant Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis.

Journal of the New Jersey Dental Association·2018
Same journal

Giving Back by Giving Smiles. Smile Bangladesh Repairs Cleft Palates and Lives.

Journal of the New Jersey Dental Association·2018
Same journal

Re-Examining Safety Protocols for Tylenol.

Journal of the New Jersey Dental Association·2018
See all related articles

Following epidemiological study principles prevents false assumptions. This guide helps health professionals and the public evaluate studies correctly, reducing confusion and promoting accurate health information.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Epidemiological studies are crucial for understanding disease patterns and health trends.
  • Deviations from established research principles can lead to significant misinterpretations.
  • Confusion exists among health professionals and the public regarding the validity of epidemiological findings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide clear guidelines for evaluating epidemiological studies.
  • To emphasize the importance of adhering to epidemiological principles.
  • To reduce confusion and promote accurate understanding of health research.

Main Methods:

  • Review of established epidemiological principles.
  • Analysis of common pitfalls in epidemiological study design and interpretation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a framework for critical appraisal of epidemiological research.

    • Main Results:

    • Failure to adhere to principles can result in erroneous conclusions.
    • Proper evaluation prevents extrapolation beyond the available data.
    • Guidelines aid in distinguishing valid findings from flawed research.

    Conclusions:

    • Adherence to epidemiological principles is essential for reliable research.
    • Effective evaluation of studies minimizes the risk of false assumptions.
    • Clear guidelines enhance scientific literacy among professionals and the public.