[Subjective and objective evaluation of treating schizophrenia with classic or atypical drugs]

Subjective and objective evaluation of pharmacological treatment was made in 105 schizophrenic in-patients. PANSS and Calgary scale as well as Van Putten scale were used. Fifty-four percent of subjects received classic neuroleptics and 46%--new atypical drugs for an average period of 8 weeks. The severity of schizophrenic symptoms during treatment as well as subjective evaluation of first effects of the drug did not differ among subjects treated with classic or atypical drugs. Depressive symptoms decreased significantly during treatment with atypicals but not with classic drugs. Also a significant decrease of depression was found under olanzapine treatment. The severity of neuroleptic-induced side-effects did not differ in both groups. Neurological side effects were more prominent in subjects after 4 weeks of therapy with risperidone, in comparison to patients receiving olanzapine. Forty-seven per-cent of patients showed a dysphoric reaction to the first dose of medication. After treatment with atypical drugs, better subjective evaluation of pharmacotherapy correlated with less severe general and depressive schizophrenia symptoms. Patients' better evaluation of olanzapine treatment correlated with less severe schizophrenic general symptomatology. The subjective evaluation of treatment was better in patients with less severe neurological side-effects of atypical drugs (including olanzapine but not risperidone) and less severe autonomic side-effects of classic drugs. The evaluation of pharmacotherapy made by patients' family members did not correlate with subjects' opinions after distribution of the first dose of the drugs, but correlated significantly with patients' opinion after 8-weeks of treatment. The treatment received by the patients was judged better by the family members if less severe neurological side-effects were present.