Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Point dose calculations using an analytical pencil beam kernel for IMRT plan checking.

Y Watanabe1

  • 1Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Department of Radiation Oncology, New York, NY 10032, USA. yw155@columbia.edu

Physics in Medicine and Biology
|April 28, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Different antigenic nature in apparently healthy women with high serum CA 125 levels compared with typical patients with ovarian cancer.

Cancer·1992
Same author

[Two cases of familial pulmonary arteriovenous fistula].

Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai zasshi·1992
Same author

Primary extramedullary plasmacytoma of the lung.

Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)·1992
Same author

Ambulatory blood pressure and postprandial hypotension.

American heart journal·1992
Same author

Blockade by antiarrhythmic drugs of glibenclamide-sensitive K+ channels in Xenopus oocytes.

British journal of pharmacology·1992
Same author

[Case report of a successful stage reduction of gastric carcinoma preoperatively treated by combined chemotherapy of 5-FU(UFT) and cisplatin].

Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy·1992
Same journal

Deep learning-based dose prediction to enhance planning efficiency in cervical brachytherapy with hybrid applicators.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Referenceless MR thermometry-a comparison of five methods (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>1-16).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: Measured and Monte Carlo simulated electron backscatter to the monitor chamber for the varian TrueBeam linac (2016<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>61</b>8779).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum: 3D range-modulator for scanned particle therapy: development, Monte Carlo simulations and experimental evaluation (2017<i>Phys. Med. Biol</i>.<b>62</b>7075).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Recent progress in applications of computing to radiotherapy (ICCR 2016).

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
Same journal

Novel TMS coils designed using an inverse boundary element method.

Physics in medicine and biology·2026
See all related articles

A new, simple method verifies radiation therapy monitor units using a distinct dose calculation algorithm. This approach ensures treatment plan accuracy within 2% for prostate cases, aiding in error detection.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Computational Dosimetry

Background:

  • Accurate verification of radiation therapy treatment plans is crucial for patient safety.
  • Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) requires robust methods for verifying calculated monitor units (MUs).
  • Existing verification methods may not be universally applicable or sufficiently independent from treatment planning system (TPS) algorithms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a simple, independent method for verifying monitor units in radiation therapy treatment plans.
  • To assess the accuracy of the proposed method across different treatment techniques and anatomical sites.
  • To provide an intuitive and generalizable tool for quality assurance in radiation oncology.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Implementation of a convolution algorithm with an analytical pencil beam kernel (eight parameters).
  • Application of the method to verify point doses, specifically at the isocenter, for intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans.
  • Comparison of calculated doses with planned doses for both step-and-shoot and sliding-window techniques.

    • Main Results:

    • The developed method achieved accuracy within +/-2% of planned doses for six-field prostate plans in uniform dose regions.
    • Head and neck cases exhibited slightly larger discrepancies compared to prostate plans.
    • Accuracy decreased in regions of high dose gradient, with differences potentially exceeding 5%.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed simple physical model and distinct dose calculation algorithm provide an accurate and generalizable method for verifying IMRT monitor units.
    • The method demonstrates good accuracy for uniform dose regions, particularly in prostate treatments.
    • Further investigation is warranted for high-dose-gradient regions to ensure comprehensive treatment plan verification.