Sensitivity to brief changes of interaural time and interaural intensity
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 8, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
Published on: November 9, 2018
L R Bernstein1, C Trahiotis, M A Akeroyd
1Department of Neuroscience, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington 06030, USA.
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to measure listeners' abilities to detect brief changes in interaural temporal disparities (ITDs) or interaural intensitive disparities (IIDs) conveyed by bursts of noise (probes) temporally and symmetrically flanked by segments of diotic or uncorrelated noise. Thresholds were measured using a four-interval, two-alternative, forced-choice adaptive task and the total duration of the bursts of noise was either 20, 40, or 100 ms. Probes were temporally centered within each burst and the durations of the probes ranged from 2 to 100 ms, depending upon the duration of the (longer) total burst of noise within which they were embedded. The results indicate that, for a given total duration of noise, there is a rapid decrease in threshold ITD or threshold IID as the duration of the probe is increased so that it occupies a larger portion of the total burst of noise. Mathematical analyses revealed that both threshold ITDs and threshold IIDs could be well accounted for by assuming that the listener processes both types of binaural cues via a single, symmetric, double-exponential temporal window. Interestingly, the shapes of the temporal windows that fit the data obtained from the human listeners resemble the shapes of the temporal windows derived by Wagner [H. Wagner, J. Comp. Physiol. A 169, 281-289 (1991)], who studied the barn owl. The time constants and relative weightings yielded temporal window functions that heavily emphasize information occurring within the very temporal center of the window. This temporal window function was found to be generalizable in the sense that it also accounts for classic data reported by Grantham and Wightman [D.W. Gratham and F.L. Wightman, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 511-523 (1978)] concerning sensitivity to dynamically changing interaural disparities.
Related Concept Videos
Sound Intensity Level
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and hence a...
Interference: Path Lengths
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Sound Intensity
Echo
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case, then the...
Sensation
Absolute thresholds can quantify the sensitivity of sensory...
Beats

