Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Foundations of the minimal clinically important difference for imaging.

M N Lassere1, D van der Heijde, K R Johnson

  • 1Department of Rheumatology, St George Hospital, Sydney, Australia. lasserem@sesahs.nsw.gov.au

The Journal of Rheumatology
|May 1, 2001
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a framework for defining and validating the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). It proposes three methods: distribution-based, opinion-based, and a data-driven experimental approach for robust MCID determination.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Local hydroclimate alters interpretation of speleothem δ<sup>18</sup>O records.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

Performance of cut-offs of the ASAS Health Index to discriminate between treatment groups in patients with axial spondyloarthritis in the TICOSPA trial.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2024
Same author

The ASAS-OMERACT core domain set for axial spondyloarthritis.

Seminars in arthritis and rheumatism·2021
Same author

Exceptional continental record of biotic recovery after the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2019
Same author

Spinal radiographic progression over 2 years in ankylosing spondylitis patients treated with secukinumab: a historical cohort comparison.

Arthritis research & therapy·2019
Same author

Is it Useful to Repeat Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Sacroiliac Joints After Three Months or One Year in the Diagnosis of Patients With Chronic Back Pain and Suspected Axial Spondyloarthritis?

Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.)·2018

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research Methodology
  • Health Outcomes Measurement

Background:

  • Defining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is crucial for interpreting treatment effects.
  • Existing methods for MCID validation have limitations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a generic conceptual framework for defining and validating MCID.
  • To propose and compare three distinct approaches for MCID determination.

Main Methods:

  • Distribution-based approach using statistical population descriptions.
  • Opinion-based approach relying on expert consensus.
  • Predictive/data-driven approach based on sequential hypothesis testing and experimental validation.

Main Results:

  • The distribution-based and opinion-based methods serve as proxies for the data-driven approach.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The data-driven approach is experimentally driven, focusing on 'least penalty' or 'greatest gain'.

    • Conclusions:

    • The proposed framework offers a structured method for MCID validation.
    • The data-driven approach, while resource-intensive, provides a more robust experimental basis for MCID.