Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interpreting positive studies.

S D Simon1

  • 1Office of Medical Research, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri 64108, USA. ssimon@cmh.edu

Journal of Andrology
|May 2, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Critically evaluate positive research findings by assessing if outcomes truly matter to patients and if the observed effects are clinically significant, not just statistically so. Ensure research results have practical implications for patient care and decision-making.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comprehensive electronic medical record implementation levels not associated with 30-day all-cause readmissions within Medicare beneficiaries with heart failure.

Applied clinical informatics·2014
Same author

HIV gp120- and methamphetamine-mediated oxidative stress induces astrocyte apoptosis via cytochrome P450 2E1.

Cell death & disease·2013
Same author

Associations between the concurrent use of clinical decision support and computerized provider order entry and the rates of appropriate prescribing at discharge.

Applied clinical informatics·2013
Same author

Dexamethasone significantly attenuates sub-arachnoid hemorrhage-induced elevation in cerebrospinal fluid citrulline and leukocytes.

Journal of neurosurgical sciences·2012
Same author

Activity of fulvestrant in HER2-overexpressing advanced breast cancer.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2009
Same author

Resolution of trigeminal neuralgia after palliative embolization of a cerebellopontine angle arteriovenous malformation.

Central European neurosurgery·2009
Same journal

Special Section: Commemorating the Journal of Andrology's Distinguished History.

Journal of andrology·2012
Same journal

Parting messages from current and former editors of the Journal of Andrology.

Journal of andrology·2012
Same journal

Evolution of the Journal of Andrology and a bright future for Andrology.

Journal of andrology·2012
Same journal

Management of erectile dysfunction: great progress, greater promise.

Journal of andrology·2012
Same journal

Aging and declining testosterone: past, present, and hopes for the future.

Journal of andrology·2012
Same journal

The genetics of male fertility--from basic science to clinical evaluation.

Journal of andrology·2012
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research Methodology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Health Outcomes Research

Background:

  • Positive research findings are often readily accepted.
  • However, statistical significance does not always equate to clinical importance.
  • Evaluating the practical implications of study results is crucial for healthcare professionals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the critical assessment of clinical relevance in positive research studies.
  • To guide researchers and clinicians in interpreting study outcomes beyond statistical significance.
  • To promote a deeper understanding of the impact of research on patient care.

Main Methods:

  • This study involves a conceptual analysis of clinical relevance in research interpretation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • It outlines key considerations for evaluating the meaningfulness of study outcomes.
  • The focus is on the application of critical appraisal skills to research findings.

    • Main Results:

    • Two primary criteria for clinical relevance are identified: direct patient interest in outcomes and effect size beyond clinical indifference.
    • Statistical significance alone is insufficient for determining the value of a study's findings.
    • A thorough evaluation of clinical relevance is essential before accepting research conclusions.

    Conclusions:

    • Researchers and clinicians must rigorously assess clinical relevance when interpreting positive study results.
    • Outcome measures should directly benefit or be linked to patient well-being.
    • The magnitude of observed effects must be clinically meaningful to justify changes in practice or patient management.