Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prepulse effects as a function of cortical projection system.

W M Perlstein1, R F Simons, F K Graham

  • 1Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, University of Florida, HSC, P.O. Box 100165, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. wmp@grove.ufl.edu

Biological Psychology
|May 4, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

N400 to semantically anomalous pictures and words.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

The late positive potential, emotion and apathy in Parkinson's disease.

Neuropsychologia·2013
Same author

Performance of brain-damaged cases on a memory-for-designs test.

Journal of abnormal psychology·2010
Same author

Note on the scoring of the memory-for-designs test.

Journal of abnormal psychology·2010
Same author

Individualized piano instruction enhances executive functioning and working memory in older adults.

Aging & mental health·2007
Same author

Cross-modal warning effects on reflexive and voluntary reactions.

Psychophysiology·2002
Same journal

Afterword to the Biological Psychology Special Issue:Contributions of the Vagus to Psychological Functioning and Health:Reflections upon genuine relations between vagus-nerve functioning and psychological processes.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Characterizing Individual Differences in SCR Responsivity: A Hybrid Mixture and Single-Trial Modeling Framework.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Your Heart Beats Next To Mine: Daily Physiological Synchrony Among Black And White ADRD Caregiver-Care Recipient Dyads.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Stimulus arousal level and savoring:an electrocortical investigation.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Neural response to reward and pathological personality dimensions.

Biological psychology·2026
Same journal

Early automatic and late lateralised top-down mechanisms for 3D perception.

Biological psychology·2026
See all related articles

A gating mechanism reduces startle responses and sensory processing. This study shows crossmodal pairing of stimuli inhibits startle blink and event-related potentials (ERPs), suggesting an extrinsic inhibitory mechanism.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Processing
  • Auditory and Tactile Perception

Background:

  • A gating mechanism is proposed to modulate sensory input, reducing responses to startling stimuli.
  • Understanding this mechanism is crucial for comprehending sensory gating and its role in perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if a gating mechanism involves extrinsic modulation.
  • To determine how crossmodal pairing affects modality-specific and non-specific neural activity.
  • To assess the impact of crossmodal pairing on the perceptual magnitude of stimuli.

Main Methods:

  • Tactile and auditory stimuli were presented alone and in pairs with varying intervals (60 ms, 360 ms).
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded from midline and lateral scalp sites.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Electromyography (EMG) measured facial and scalp muscle activity, including blink reflex.

    • Main Results:

    • Stimulus pairing significantly reduced blink reflex and midline ERP amplitudes (P50, N100, P200), with greater reduction at longer intervals.
    • The P30 component of ERPs was largely unaffected by pairing.
    • Lateral N100 components showed differential effects, indicating modulation of modality-specific and non-specific system activity.

    Conclusions:

    • Prestimulus inhibition of ERPs is not caused by intrinsic refractoriness of neural pathways.
    • Crossmodal pairing activates an extrinsic gating mechanism that differentially modulates neural activity across sensory systems.
    • This mechanism influences both sensory processing and the perception of startling stimuli.