Comparison of CT angiography with conventional arterial angiography in aortoiliac occlusive disease
1Department of Diagnostic Imaging, North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust, Newcastle Road, Stoke on Trent ST4 6QG, UK.
Insights
Conventional and CT angiography show similar results for aortoiliac occlusive disease. CT angiography offers advantages like minimally invasive imaging and better visualization of stenoses and collaterals.
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Diagnostic Imaging
- Radiology
Background:
- Occlusive disease of the aortoiliac segment significantly impacts peripheral circulation.
- Accurate assessment of disease severity is crucial for treatment planning.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of conventional angiography and computed tomography (CT) angiography for evaluating the aortoiliac segment.
Main Methods:
- 35 patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease underwent both conventional and CT angiography.
- Two independent assessors graded disease severity in the aortoiliac segment.
- Interobserver agreement and concordance between modalities were analyzed.
Main Results:
- Conventional angiography had 87% interobserver agreement, while CT angiography had 78%.
- Both modalities provided identical grading in 84% of segments.
- CT angiography demonstrated advantages in visualizing soft tissues, asymmetrical stenoses, and collateral supply, despite potential limitations with short stenoses.
Conclusions:
- CT angiography is a valuable, minimally invasive tool for assessing aortoiliac occlusive disease.
- While conventional angiography shows slightly higher interobserver agreement, CT angiography provides complementary information beneficial for clinical decision-making.
Abstract:
This study compared the results of conventional and CT angiography of the aortoiliac segment in 35 patients with occlusive disease. Disease severity was graded into five categories. Two assessors independently assessed the segment from the distal abdominal aorta to the proximal superficial femoral artery and a consensus was formed. There was interobserver agreement in 87% of segments for conventional angiography and in 78% for CT angiography. Comparison of the two modalities gave identical grading in 84% of segments. Dissimilar grading was found in 16%, with a roughly equal number of undergrading and overgrading. CT angiography has the advantages of being minimally invasive, requiring only an intravenous injection of contrast medium and imaging surrounding soft tissues. Multiplanar reconstruction aids the visualization of asymmetrical stenoses, and collateral blood supply is readily appreciated. However, CT angiography may fail to demonstrate short stenoses owing to limited z-axis resolution.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm III: Interprofessional Care
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging

