Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Preventing and resolving ethical conflicts: more help for policy makers.

¹Department of Bioethics, Dalhousie University, 5849 University Ave., Halifax, NS, Canada B3H 4H7.

Healthcare Management Forum

|May 8, 2001

Summary

This paper clarifies ethical conflict resolution in healthcare policy. It offers guidance on benefit, power imbalance, and decisional authority to aid policymakers.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

What's the message? A content analysis of newspaper articles about assisted reproductive technology from 2005 to 2011.

Human fertility (Cambridge, England)·2014

Same author

Genetic testing: a family affair.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2003

Same author

Good policy, good process.

The American journal of bioethics : AJOB·2002

Same author

Culture, ethics, and pediatric surgery.

Seminars in pediatric surgery·2001

Same author

Shifting the autonomy debate to theory as ideology.

The Journal of medicine and philosophy·2001

Same author

Organizational ethics Canadian style.

HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues·2000

Area of Science:

Medical Ethics
Healthcare Policy
Conflict Resolution

Background:

Existing "Joint Statement on Preventing and Resolving Ethical Conflicts" offers a valuable resource for institutional policymakers.
Certain aspects of the joint statement present challenges for developing institutional policies.
Further reflection is needed to augment and clarify recommendations for practical application.

Purpose of the Study:

To provide additional guidance for institutional policy development concerning ethical conflicts.
To clarify and augment recommendations within the "Joint Statement on Preventing and Resolving Ethical Conflicts Involving Healthcare Providers and Persons Receiving Care".

Main Methods:

Analysis of the "Joint Statement on Preventing and Resolving Ethical Conflicts".

Main Results:

Identified challenges in applying the joint statement to institutional policy.
Provided supplementary guidance on key ethical considerations: benefit, power imbalance, and legitimate decisional authority.

Conclusions:

The "Joint Statement on Preventing and Resolving Ethical Conflicts" is a useful resource but requires further clarification for policy development.
Additional guidance on benefit, power imbalance, and decisional authority can enhance institutional policies for ethical conflict resolution.

Related Experiment Videos