Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Developing explosive power: a comparison of technique and training.

J Cronin1, P J McNair, R N Marshall

  • 1Sport Performance Centre-Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand.

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
|May 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Long-Term Associations between Water Fluoridation and Adult Dental Caries.

Journal of dental research·2026
Same author

Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Irish medical journal·2024
Same author

A quality appraisal of economic evaluations of community water fluoridation: A systematic review.

Community dental health·2024
Same author

Individual distribution of muscle hypertrophy among hamstring muscle heads: Adding muscle volume where you need is not so simple.

Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports·2024
Same author

Financial resilience among doctors in training and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Irish medical journal·2023
Same author

Effect of Covid-19 on Emergency Sore Throat Presentations.

Irish medical journal·2022

This study found that rebound movements and releasing the bar significantly increase upper body power output. Optimal loads for maximizing mean and peak power range from 50-70% of one-repetition maximum (1RM).

Area of Science:

  • Sports Science
  • Biomechanics
  • Exercise Physiology

Background:

  • Understanding factors influencing muscular power is crucial for athletic performance.
  • Previous research has explored load and contraction type independently, but less is known about their combined effects on upper body power.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of contraction type and movement type on upper body muscular power output.
  • To determine optimal loading ranges for maximizing mean and peak power.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty-seven male athletes with no recent weight training experience participated.
  • Loads ranging from 30-80% of one-repetition maximum (1RM) were used.
  • Multivariate analysis of variance with repeated measures was employed to analyze the data.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Rebound motion increased mean power output by 11.7% compared to concentric-only motion.
  • Rebound movements enhanced peak accelerations (38.5%) and peak forces (14.1%).
  • Releasing the bar during the movement was a key factor for peak power, associated with higher mean (4.4%) and peak (6.7%) velocities.

Conclusions:

  • Both contraction and movement types significantly affect mean and peak power output.
  • Loads between 50-70% 1RM appear to maximize both mean and peak power.
  • Optimizing power output requires understanding the force-velocity characteristics of movements and individual training status.