Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sampling considerations for intensity modulated radiotherapy verification using electronic portal imaging.

P M Evans1, M Partridge, J R Symonds-Tayler

  • 1Joint Physics Department, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom. p.evans@icr.ac.uk

Medical Physics
|May 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

AAPS Perspective on the EURL Recommendation on the use of Non-Animal-Derived Antibodies.

The AAPS journal·2021
Same author

An end-to-end assessment on the accuracy of adaptive radiotherapy in an MR-linac.

Physics in medicine and biology·2021
Same author

The stability of imaging biomarkers in radiomics: a framework for evaluation.

Physics in medicine and biology·2019
Same author

Stomach Dose-Volume Predicts Acute Gastrointestinal Toxicity in Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2018
Same author

The Use of Social Media to Combat Research-Isolation.

Annals of the Entomological Society of America·2018
Same author

CMOS Active Pixel Sensors as energy-range detectors for proton Computed Tomography.

Journal of instrumentation : an IOP and SISSA journal·2017

A new model analyzes electronic portal imaging device (EPID) sampling during intensity modulated radiotherapy. Sparse temporal sampling can cause significant dosimetric errors, but 1-2 second frame intervals minimize inaccuracies.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Imaging Science

Background:

  • Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) requires precise dose delivery verification.
  • Electronic portal imaging devices (EPIDs) are used for real-time treatment monitoring.
  • EPID image acquisition involves temporal sampling with dead-time, potentially affecting accuracy.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a model for EPID sampling during IMRT.
  • To investigate the impact of imaging duty cycle and frame rate on dosimetric verification accuracy.
  • To determine optimal imaging parameters for reliable IMRT dose verification.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a mathematical model simulating EPID frame acquisition with dead-time.
  • Simulated various imaging scenarios: different frame intervals (1-16s) and duty cycles (25-75%).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Modeled and imaged different intensity profiles (hemispherical, pixellated, breast radiotherapy beam).

    • Main Results:

    • Sparse temporal sampling (long frame intervals) can lead to ~10% dosimetric errors with oscillatory patterns.
    • Using 1-2 second frame intervals resulted in minimal errors (1%-2%) across studied duty cycles.
    • The specific beam patterns and sampling conditions influenced the observed error magnitudes.

    Conclusions:

    • EPID temporal sampling characteristics significantly affect IMRT dosimetric verification accuracy.
    • Frame intervals of 1-2 seconds are recommended to maintain high accuracy during IMRT verification.
    • The developed model provides a tool for understanding and optimizing EPID imaging protocols.