Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automaticity and attention: investigating automatic processing in texture segmentation with event-related brain

A Schubö1, C Meinecke, E Schröger

  • 1Institut für Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, München, Leopoldstr. 13, 80802, Munich, Germany. schubo@psy.uni-muenchen.de

Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research
|May 8, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatial auditory regularity encoding and prediction: Human middle-latency and long-latency auditory evoked potentials.

Brain research·2015
Same author

A neural mechanism for involuntary attention shifts to changes in auditory stimulation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

Involuntary attentional capture by speech and non-speech deviations: a combined behavioral-event-related potential study.

Brain research·2012
Same author

Spectrotemporal processing drives fast access to memory traces for spoken words.

NeuroImage·2012
Same author

Top-down modulation of auditory processing: effects of sound context, musical expertise and attentional focus.

The European journal of neuroscience·2009
Same author

Selective tuning of cortical sound-feature processing by language experience.

The European journal of neuroscience·2006

Texture segmentation, an early visual process, shows partial automaticity. While the posterior N2 component is automatic, the P3 component depends on attentional resources.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Texture segmentation, the detection of visual irregularities, is often studied with tasks requiring full attention.
  • Automaticity implies processing occurs even without directed attention, such as during a concurrent primary task.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the automaticity of texture segmentation in early vision.
  • To determine the role of attention in texture segmentation using event-related potentials (ERPs).

Main Methods:

  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded during texture segmentation tasks.
  • Experiments manipulated the task relevance and complexity of primary tasks while participants performed texture discrimination.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two ERP components, posterior N2 and P3, were sensitive to texture segmentation.
  • Both components were present even when texture segmentation was task-irrelevant.
  • The posterior N2 demonstrated automaticity, unaffected by primary task complexity.
  • The P3 component's amplitude varied with the attentional resources available from the primary task.

Conclusions:

  • Early visual processing of texture segmentation exhibits a degree of automaticity, particularly the posterior N2 component.
  • Attentional resources significantly influence later stages of visual processing, as indicated by the P3 component's dependency on task demands.