Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The effects of concurrent task interference on category learning: evidence for multiple category learning systems.

E M Waldron1, F G Ashby

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|May 9, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Cognitive load from a numerical Stroop task hindered learning simple explicit rules but not complex implicit rules. This suggests category learning involves distinct cognitive systems.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the nature of implicit categorization.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Suboptimality in human categorization and identification.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2001
Same author

On the dominance of unidimensional rules in unsupervised categorization.

Perception & psychophysics·1999
Same author

A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition.

Psychological review·1999
Same author

A neuropsychological theory of multiple systems in category learning.

Psychological review·1998
Same author

Response time distributions in multidimensional perceptual categorization.

Perception & psychophysics·1998

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Category learning is fundamental to cognition.
  • It is hypothesized to involve multiple interacting learning systems.
  • Understanding how cognitive load affects different learning systems is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of cognitive load on explicit and implicit category learning.
  • To determine if different category structures are differentially affected by concurrent task demands.
  • To provide evidence for multiple learning systems in category acquisition.

Main Methods:

  • Participants learned simple (explicit rule) and complex (implicit rule) category structures.
  • Learning occurred under single-task and dual-task (numerical Stroop) conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance was measured by accuracy and learning speed.

    • Main Results:

    • The numerical Stroop task significantly impaired learning of simple, explicit category rules.
    • Learning of complex, implicit category rules was not significantly hindered by the Stroop task.
    • This dissociation suggests distinct neural mechanisms for explicit and implicit learning.

    Conclusions:

    • Category learning is mediated by multiple, independent learning systems.
    • Explicit rule-based learning is more susceptible to cognitive interference than implicit learning.
    • These findings support a dual-system model of category acquisition.