Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Infants' knowledge about occlusion and containment events: a surprising discrepancy.

S J Hespos1, R Baillargeon

  • 1Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, M.I.T. NE20-423, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. hespos@mit.edu

Psychological Science
|May 9, 2001
PubMed
Summary

Infants learn about physical events by developing specific rules rather than general principles. At 4.5 months, they understand height in occlusion but not containment, with containment reasoning emerging at 7.5 months.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reasoning about containment events in very young infants.

Cognition·2000
Same author

Perseveration and problem solving in infancy.

Advances in child development and behavior·2000
Same author

Infants' use of featural and experiential information in segregating and individuating objects: a reply to Xu, Carey and Welch (2000)

Cognition·2000
Same author

2.5-month-old infants' reasoning about when objects should and should not be occluded.

Cognitive psychology·1999
Same author

Object individuation in infancy: the use of featural information in reasoning about occlusion events.

Cognitive psychology·1999
Same author

The development of calibration-based reasoning about collision events in young infants.

Cognition·1998

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Development
  • Infant Perception
  • Object Permanence

Background:

  • Understanding how infants learn about physical causality is crucial for cognitive development research.
  • Previous studies suggest infants possess some innate physical knowledge, but the nature of this knowledge (general vs. specific) remains debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether infants acquire general principles or specific rules when learning about physical events.
  • To determine the developmental trajectory of infants' reasoning about height in occlusion versus containment scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Four-and-a-half-month-old infants were tested on their ability to judge object height during occlusion and containment events.
  • Seven-and-a-half-month-old infants were also tested in containment events to track developmental changes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Infants at 4.5 months could reason about object height in occlusion events but not in containment events.
  • The ability to reason about height in containment events emerged later, around 7.5 months of age.

Conclusions:

  • Infants appear to develop distinct, category-specific rules for different physical events rather than applying general principles.
  • This suggests a nuanced learning process where infants categorize physical interactions and learn unique rules for each category.