Binding of recombinant apolipoprotein(a) to human platelets and effect on platelet aggregation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2026
Platelet Adhesion and Aggregation Under Flow using Microfluidic Flow Cells
Published on: October 27, 2009
C Martínez1, J Rivera, S Loyau
1Unit of Hematology and Clinical Oncology, University General Hospital, Murcia, Spain.
The interaction of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] with platelets is not well defined, particularly with regards to the individual contribution of the protein components of Lp(a), the apo B-100 and the apolipoprotein apo(a). This study investigated the binding of different recombinant apo(a) [r-apo(a)] isoforms, to human platelets and its effect on platelet aggregation. Scatchard analysis of saturation binding experiments demonstrated that human platelets display a single class of high affinity r-apo(a) binding sites (71 +/- 46 molec./platelet, Kd = 5.6 +/- 2.0 nmol/L). Platelet activation with strong agonists (thrombin, arachidonic acid) increased 2- to 10-fold the r-apo(a) binding, without affecting the affinity. Competition assays showed that the binding sites are highly specific for r-apo(a) and Lp(a). At high concentration t-PA could also bind to the r-apo(a) binding sites. By contrast, neither fibrinogen nor plasminogen inhibited to the r-apo(a) binding. The lysine analogue EACA inhibits the binding of r-apo(a) to platelets, thus suggesting the involvement of lysine residues in that interaction. Moreover, the r-apo(a) binding to platelets is unlikely mediated by GPIIb/IIIa-attached fibrin since it is not affected by platelet treatment with either LJ-CP8, a monoclonal antibody that specifically blocks fibrinogen binding to GPIIb/IIIa, nor GPRP, an inhibitor of fibrin polymerisation. Finally, we show that the distinct recombinant apo(a) proteins, as well as native Lp(a), promote an aggregation response of platelets to otherwise subaggregant doses of arachidonic acid. This proaggregant effect of r-apo(a) is dependent on its binding to platelets since it requires a minimum incubation time, and it is prevented by EACA at concentration inhibiting the r-apo(a)-platelet interaction. These results suggest that the prothrombotic action of Lp(a) may be in part mediated by modulating the platelet function through the interaction of its apo(a) subunit with a specific receptor at the platelet surface.
The interaction of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] with platelets is not well defined, particularly with regards to the individual contribution of the protein components of Lp(a), the apo B-100 and the apolipoprotein apo(a). This study investigated the binding of different recombinant apo(a) [r-apo(a)] isoforms, to human platelets and its effect on platelet aggregation. Scatchard analysis of saturation binding experiments demonstrated that human platelets display a single class of high affinity r-apo(a) binding sites (71 +/- 46 molec./platelet, Kd = 5.6 +/- 2.0 nmol/L). Platelet activation with strong agonists (thrombin, arachidonic acid) increased 2- to 10-fold the r-apo(a) binding, without affecting the affinity. Competition assays showed that the binding sites are highly specific for r-apo(a) and Lp(a). At high concentration t-PA could also bind to the r-apo(a) binding sites. By contrast, neither fibrinogen nor plasminogen inhibited to the r-apo(a) binding. The lysine analogue EACA inhibits the binding of r-apo(a) to platelets, thus suggesting the involvement of lysine residues in that interaction. Moreover, the r-apo(a) binding to platelets is unlikely mediated by GPIIb/IIIa-attached fibrin since it is not affected by platelet treatment with either LJ-CP8, a monoclonal antibody that specifically blocks fibrinogen binding to GPIIb/IIIa, nor GPRP, an inhibitor of fibrin polymerisation. Finally, we show that the distinct recombinant apo(a) proteins, as well as native Lp(a), promote an aggregation response of platelets to otherwise subaggregant doses of arachidonic acid. This proaggregant effect of r-apo(a) is dependent on its binding to platelets since it requires a minimum incubation time, and it is prevented by EACA at concentration inhibiting the r-apo(a)-platelet interaction. These results suggest that the prothrombotic action of Lp(a) may be in part mediated by modulating the platelet function through the interaction of its apo(a) subunit with a specific receptor at the platelet surface.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:20Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
01:22Formation of the Platelet Plug
As the injured blood vessel contracts, endothelial cells undergo contraction, revealing collagen fibers in the basement membrane and underlying connective tissue. Furthermore, the plasma membrane of endothelial cells becomes adhesive, preparing the site for platelet adhesion. Platelets...
01:18Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Drug-Related Factors
One crucial factor in drug-protein binding is the drug's lipophilicity or its affinity for fat. More lipophilic drugs tend to have higher binding extents. For example, highly lipophilic drugs like cloxacillin exhibit substantial protein binding, with as much as 95% of the drug binding to proteins. In contrast,...
01:23Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Drug Interactions
Displacement interactions can have varying outcomes, ranging from toxicity to virtually...
01:20Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Protein-Related Factors
The physicochemical properties of a drug play a significant role in its ability to bind to proteins. Lipophilic drugs, which dissolve in fats, oils, and lipids, can be bound by...
01:29Drug Distribution: Plasma Protein Binding