Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Getting scientists to think about what they are doing.

J Ziman1

  • 1University of Bristol, UK. jmziman@cs.com

Science and Engineering Ethics
|May 15, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Molecular cloning of a novel bone-forming compound: osteoinductive factor.

DNA and cell biology·1990
Same author

Finalization and/or collectivization.

Cell·1985
Same author

The research enterprise in the soviet union.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1978
Same author

The "winter college" format.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·1971
Same author

Cycles in social behaviour.

Nature·1971
Same journal

Not Another Grocery List: Proposals for an Effective AI Ethics Implementation.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

From Biopiracy to Sustainable Knowledge Governance: Epistemic Justice and the Reconstruction of Resource Sovereignty in the Global South.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Deliberative Lab Communication and the Practice of Ethical Science.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Graduate Students Find Content of Responsible Conduct of Research Coursework Useful.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Discursive Ethics as a Normative Foundation for Integrating Ethics into AI Clinical Decision Support Systems.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
Same journal

Tragedies of Technology: An Exploration of Such Narratives.

Science and engineering ethics·2026
See all related articles

Science education must evolve beyond specialized knowledge production to address the societal implications of scientific advancements. This requires integrating philosophical, ethical, and social sciences to prepare students for the complex realities of technoscience.

Area of Science:

  • Science Education
  • Philosophy of Science
  • Sociology of Science

Background:

  • Traditional science training focuses on specialized knowledge, neglecting the broader societal role and impact of scientific research.
  • Growing public concern necessitates a re-evaluation of science education's curriculum to include ethical and philosophical considerations.
  • Current scientific practices, termed technoscience, involve complex social, political, and economic dimensions that traditional ethics cannot fully address.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for a new approach to science education, termed 'metascience', that encompasses social and humanistic aspects.
  • To equip science students with the capacity to critically analyze the production and application of scientific knowledge.
  • To prepare future scientists for the ethical dilemmas and societal responsibilities inherent in contemporary research.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis integrating philosophy, ethics, sociology, and cognitive psychology.
  • Examination of the evolving nature of scientific practices, institutions, and societal relationships.
  • Proposal for curriculum reform in science education to include 'metascience' principles.

Main Results:

  • Conventional philosophical and ethical frameworks are insufficient for understanding modern technoscience.
  • A multidisciplinary approach, incorporating social and humanistic perspectives, is crucial for comprehensive science education.
  • Science is undergoing rapid transformations in research, organization, and societal integration.

Conclusions:

  • Science education must be reformed to include 'metascience', fostering critical thinking about the societal role of science.
  • Students need to understand the practices, ethical challenges, and societal responsibilities of research scientists.
  • Preparing scientists requires acknowledging the dynamic and socially embedded nature of contemporary science.