Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Superior performance for visually guided pointing in the lower visual field.

J Danckert1, M A Goodale

  • 1Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Group on Action and Perception, Department of Psychology, Social Science Center, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 5C2, Canada. jdanckert@julian.uwo.ca

Experimental Brain Research
|May 18, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A self-regulatory approach to understanding boredom proneness.

Cognition & emotion·2015
Same author

Weightlifting exercise and the size-weight illusion.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2013
Same author

Neural correlates of motion processing through echolocation, source hearing, and vision in blind echolocation experts and sighted echolocation novices.

Journal of neurophysiology·2013
Same author

The nature and limits of orientation and pattern processing supporting visuomotor control in a visual form agnosic.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
Same author

What is the best fixation target? The effect of target shape on stability of fixational eye movements.

Vision research·2012
Same author

Near, far, or in between?-Target edges and the transport component of prehension.

Journal of motor behavior·2009

Humans show a bias for processing information in the lower visual field (loVF), with faster and more accurate visually guided pointing movements in the loVF compared to the upper visual field (upVF). This suggests a functional advantage for skilled movements in the loVF.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Human motor control
  • Visual perception

Background:

  • The superior hemiretina has higher ganglion cell density than the inferior hemiretina, indicating a bias for processing the lower visual field (loVF).
  • This loVF over-representation extends to primate visual cortex, including the dorsal 'action' pathway (e.g., area V6A).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the loVF processing bias influences the control of visually guided pointing movements.
  • To compare the speed and accuracy of hand pointing movements in the loVF versus the upper visual field (upVF).

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed visually guided pointing movements towards targets in either the loVF or upVF.
  • Movement kinematics and accuracy were recorded and analyzed.
  • Biomechanics of movements were assessed to control for confounding factors.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Visually guided pointing movements were significantly faster in the loVF compared to the upVF.
  • Pointing movements in the loVF were also more accurate than those in the upVF.
  • No significant differences in movement biomechanics were observed between the loVF and upVF conditions.

Conclusions:

  • A functional advantage exists for controlling visually guided pointing movements in the loVF.
  • This loVF advantage is likely not due to retinal factors but reflects a specialized neural bias for motor control in this spatial region.
  • The findings suggest a dedicated neural mechanism supporting skilled motor actions in the lower visual field.