Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Phase transitions and postural deviations during bimanual kinesthetic tracking.

J W Stinear1, W D Byblow

  • 1Human Motor Control Laboratory, Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand.

Experimental Brain Research
|May 18, 2001
PubMed
Summary

This study on upper limb coordination found that inphase (IP) movements are more stable than antiphase (AP) movements. Antiphase coordination demands more cognitive resources, impacting reaction times.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Does hypnotic susceptibility influence information processing speed and motor cortical preparatory activity?

Neuropsychologia·2019
Same author

An update on predicting motor recovery after stroke.

Annals of physical and rehabilitation medicine·2014
Same author

The fall and rise of corticomotor excitability with cancellation and reinitiation of prepared action.

Journal of neurophysiology·2014
Same author

Transforming neurorehabilitation of walking following stroke: the promise of non-invasive brain stimulation--a review.

Restorative neurology and neuroscience·2011
Same author

Conceptual binding: integrated visual cues reduce processing costs in bimanual movements.

Journal of neurophysiology·2009
Same author

Ipsilateral corticospinal projections do not predict congenital mirror movements: a case report.

Neuropsychologia·2006

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Biomechanics
  • Human Motor Control

Background:

  • Understanding upper limb coordination is crucial for diagnosing and treating motor control deficits.
  • Rhythmical coordination between hands involves complex neural processes and biomechanical interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the pattern stability of between-hand rhythmical coordination.
  • To explore the central capacity demands of different coordination patterns (inphase vs. antiphase).
  • To identify factors influencing phase transitions in upper limb movements.

Main Methods:

  • Kinesthetic tracking paradigm with a computer-controlled servo-motor to guide hand movements.
  • Analysis of relative phase in wrist flexion-extension movements under constrained conditions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Inclusion of a secondary probe reaction time task to assess cognitive load.
  • Electromyographic (EMG) analysis of wrist flexor and extensor muscle activity.

    • Main Results:

    • Inphase (IP) movement patterns exhibited greater stability compared to antiphase (AP) patterns.
    • Fewer phase transitions from AP to IP occurred when specific wrist constraints were applied.
    • Longer reaction times were observed for AP movements, indicating higher central capacity demands.
    • Dynamic principles observed mirrored those in active bimanual coordination.

    Conclusions:

    • Inphase coordination is more stable and less cognitively demanding than antiphase coordination.
    • Specific limb constraints can influence movement stability and phase transitions.
    • Findings suggest unique central control mechanisms for coupled bimanual activities.