Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 7, 2026

Methods for the Discovery of Novel Compounds Modulating a Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Receptor Type A Neurotransmission
Published on: August 16, 2018
Structural modifications to an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist result in large differences in trapping block
G A Mealing1, T H Lanthorn, D L Small
1Institute for Biological Sciences, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Geoff.Mealing@nrc.ca
Abstract:
Differences in the degree of trapping of initial block by N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists may affect their safety and, hence, suitability for clinical trials. In this comparative study, 23 compounds structurally related to the low-affinity, use-dependent NMDA receptor antagonist (S)-alpha-phenyl-2-pyridineethanamine dihydrochloride (AR-R15896AR) were examined to determine the degree of trapping block they exhibit. Compounds were tested at concentrations that produced a comparable initial 80% block of NMDA-mediated whole-cell current in rat cortical cultures. A wide range of values of trapping block was found, indicating that trapping is not an all-or-none event. Fifteen of the compounds trapped significantly more than the 54 +/- 3% of initial block trapped by AR-R15896AR. The off-rates of these compounds were slower than that of AR-R15896AR. Only 2 of the 23 compounds trapped significantly less than AR-R15896AR. AR-R15808, the piperidine analog of AR-R15896AR, appeared to trap only 8 +/- 3% of its initial block, although its fast off-rate confounded accurate quantification of trapping. AR-R26952, which, like AR-R15896AR, contains a pyridine in place of a phenyl group, trapped 40 +/- 5% of its initial block and exhibited kinetics comparable with AR-R15896AR. Structure-activity analysis suggested that the presence of two basic nitrogen atoms and decreased hydrophobicity led to decreased trapping. There was no correlation between trapping and lipophilicity as would be expected if closed-channel egress was due to escape through the lipid bilayer. However, there was a positive correlation between off-rate and degree of trapping. Models that can account for partial trapping are presented.
Related Concept Videos
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
Adrenergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Aromatic ring substitutions: Substituting the aromatic ring with –OH groups at positions 3 and 4 yields catecholamines (e.g., epinephrine), which have a high affinity for adrenoceptors. Hydrogen bonding between –OH groups and receptors enhances adrenergic activity.
Separation of the aromatic...
Adrenergic Antagonists: Chemistry and Classification of ɑ-Receptor Blockers
Nonselective α-blockers: Nonselective α-blockers contain haloalkylamine or imidazoline moieties. Phenoxybenzamine, with a haloalkylamine...
The Two-State Receptor Model
The binding affinity of a drug determines its interaction with one...
Ligand-Gated Ion Channel Receptor: Gating Mechanism
Drug-Receptor Interaction: Antagonist
Antagonists can be classified as competitive or noncompetitive based on their...

