Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Managing values in personal food systems.

M Connors1, C A Bisogni, J Sobal

  • 1Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA. mmc17@cornell.edu

Appetite
|May 19, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Erratum: Centrality-Dependent Modification of Jet-Production Rates in Deuteron-Gold Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=200  GeV [Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 122301 (2016)].

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Disentangling Centrality Bias and Final-State Effects in the Production of High-p_{T} Neutral Pions Using Direct Photon in d+Au Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=200  GeV.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Measurement of Direct-Photon Cross Section and Double-Helicity Asymmetry at sqrt[s]=510  GeV in p[over →]+p[over →] Collisions.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Quantifying the Size and Duration of a Microburst-Producing Chorus Region on 5 December 2017.

Geophysical research letters·2022
Same author

Probing Gluon Spin-Momentum Correlations in Transversely Polarized Protons through Midrapidity Isolated Direct Photons in p^{↑}+p Collisions at sqrt[s]=200  GeV.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Erratum: Evolution of π^{0} Suppression in Au+Au Collisions from sqrt[s_{NN}]=39 to 200 GeV [Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 152301 (2012)].

Physical review letters·2020

Adults navigate complex food choices using personal food systems. These systems dynamically manage values like taste, health, and cost across different eating situations.

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Science
  • Food Studies
  • Sociology

Background:

  • Post-industrial societies present complex food environments.
  • Diverse food products and eating situations challenge decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine how individuals manage values when making food choices.
  • To understand the processes underlying food-choice decisions in various contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative study analyzing 86 semi-structured interviews.
  • In-depth interviews with a diverse urban adult population.
  • Grounded theory approach to identify personal food systems.

Main Results:

  • All participants utilized a personal food system for decision-making.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Key values managed include taste, health, cost, time, and social relationships.
  • Processes involved categorizing, prioritizing, and balancing values dynamically.

    • Conclusions:

    • Personal food systems are dynamic frameworks for managing food-related values.
    • Understanding these systems aids in developing eating behavior theories.
    • Insights can improve health communication strategies related to food choices.