Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery.

R E Sosa1, M Seiba, S Shichman

  • 1James Buchanan Brady Foundation, Department of Urology, The New York Presbyterian Hospital, Weill Medical College, Cornell University, New York, NY 10021, USA.

Seminars in Laparoscopic Surgery
|May 19, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The impact of FDG-PET/CT in the management of patients with vulvar and vaginal cancer.

Gynecologic oncology·2016
Same author

Volume-based quantitative FDG PET/CT metrics and their association with optimal debulking and progression-free survival in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery.

European radiology·2015
Same author

Renal calculus disease.

Current opinion in urology·2006
Same author

Hand-assisted laparoscopy in urology.

Reviews in urology·2006
Same author

Between a rock and a hard place with E/M coding: dilemmas of compliance and practice financial viability.

The Journal of medical practice management : MPM·2003
Same author

Bilateral laparoscopic adrenalectomy as a treatment for classic congenital adrenal hyperplasia attributable to 21-hydroxylase deficiency.

Pediatrics·2002
Same journal

An experimental operating room project for advanced laparoscopic surgery.

Seminars in laparoscopic surgery·2004
Same journal

Energy sources in laparoscopy.

Seminars in laparoscopic surgery·2004
Same journal

Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair: advances and limitations.

Seminars in laparoscopic surgery·2004
Same journal

Is the laparoscopic approach reasonable in cases of splenomegaly?

Seminars in laparoscopic surgery·2004
Same journal

Laparoscopic distal pancreatomy: are we ready for a standardized technique?

Seminars in laparoscopic surgery·2004
Same journal

The gastrojejunostomy in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Seminars in laparoscopic surgery·2004
See all related articles

Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy offers similar efficacy to standard laparoscopy but shows advantages over open surgery, including shorter hospital stays and faster recovery. This technique appears equivalent to standard laparoscopy for nephrectomy procedures.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Nephrectomy, the surgical removal of a kidney, can be performed using open, standard laparoscopic, or hand-assisted laparoscopic techniques.
  • Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is an evolving minimally invasive approach for various surgical procedures, including nephrectomy.
  • Comparative data on the efficacy and outcomes of HALS nephrectomy versus traditional methods are crucial for surgical decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To contrast the efficacy, postoperative morbidity, length of stay, analgesic use, and recovery time of hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy (HALN) with standard laparoscopic nephrectomy (SLN) and open nephrectomy (ON).
  • To describe the technique for HALN as performed at two institutions.
  • To compare institutional HALN results with published data for SLN and ON.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • A comparative analysis of outcomes for HALN performed at two institutions.
  • Literature review and comparison of published data for SLN and ON.
  • Evaluation of key surgical outcomes: efficacy, operative time, blood loss, postoperative morbidity, hospital stay, analgesic requirements, and recovery time.

Main Results:

  • HALN and SLN demonstrated similar efficacy, operative times, estimated blood loss, length of stay, and time to full recovery.
  • Both laparoscopic techniques (HALN and SLN) showed advantages over ON, including shorter hospital stays, faster full recovery, and reduced analgesic use.
  • Operative time for laparoscopic procedures (HALN and SLN) was longer than for ON.

Conclusions:

  • Hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy is comparable to standard laparoscopy in terms of surgical efficacy and recovery.
  • Laparoscopic nephrectomy techniques, including HALN, offer significant benefits over open surgery regarding patient recovery and hospital resource utilization.
  • As training in HALN expands, further evaluation will refine understanding of its long-term benefits and place in nephrectomy procedures.