Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Indications for caesarean section.

Z Penn1, S Ghaem-Maghami

  • 1Department of Obstetrics, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK.

Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
|May 22, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Systematic curation and analysis of ovarian cancer data across multiple electronic record systems held within the UK National Health Service: a tertiary referral centre experience.

ESMO real world data and digital oncology·2026
Same author

The use of biomarkers to stratify surgical care in women with ovarian cancer: Scientific Impact Paper No. 69 May 2022.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2022
Same author

Uterine Transplantation: Scientific Impact Paper No. 65 April 2021.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2021
Same author

Human uterine transplantation: a review of outcomes from the first 45 cases.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2019
Same author

The vaginal microbiome in uterine transplantation.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2019
Same author

Uterine transplantation in transgender women.

BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·2018
Same journal

Occupational exposures and maternal mental health across the perinatal period: a systematic review.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Essential tips on sample size calculation and biostatistics.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Non-immune causes of fetal anemia.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

A risk-based classification of late-onset fetal growth disorders according to intrapartum fetal compromise.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

The Cardiac-Fetal-Placental Unit: links between umbilical venous flow and maternal hemodynamics in fetal growth restriction.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Psychosocial interventions for women who are pregnant following a previous reproductive loss: A scoping review.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
See all related articles

Rising caesarean section rates increase maternal risks and costs, often without clear fetal benefit. Evidence for caesarean delivery as optimal for major indications needs critical examination and shared decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Global caesarean section rates are increasing, posing significant maternal mortality, morbidity, and financial burdens.
  • Justification for caesarean delivery often relies on unquantified, limited evidence of fetal benefit.
  • Trends in caesarean rates are influenced by improved medical techniques, cultural shifts, and litigation fears.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically examine the evidence supporting caesarean section as the optimal delivery mode for major indications.
  • To highlight the need for evidence-based decision-making in caesarean delivery.
  • To emphasize the importance of shared decision-making between obstetricians and pregnant women.

Main Methods:

  • Critical review of existing research and evidence on caesarean section indications.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of factors contributing to changing trends in caesarean section rates.
  • Examination of the evidence base for caesarean delivery's benefits.

    • Main Results:

    • The evidence supporting caesarean section as the optimal delivery mode for many indications is often limited and unquantified.
    • Factors beyond purely medical necessity, such as cultural expectations and fear of litigation, influence caesarean rates.
    • There is a notable lack of comprehensive research in this area.

    Conclusions:

    • Obstetricians must critically evaluate the evidence for caesarean delivery.
    • Informed consent requires sharing the evidence base with pregnant women and birth attendants.
    • Promoting evidence-based, shared decision-making is crucial for managing caesarean section rates.