Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?

M S Robson1

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Wycombe General Hospital, High Wycombe, Buckinghamshire, HP11 2TT, UK.

Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology
|May 22, 2001
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Antenatal corticosteroid prescribing: setting standards of care.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1998
Same author

A resource audit of labour induction at two hospitals in the UK.

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1997
Same author

Using the medical audit cycle to reduce cesarean section rates.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·1996
Same author

Active management of labour. Continual audit is important.

BMJ (Clinical research ed.)·1994
Same author

Amniotomy in labor.

The New England journal of medicine·1993
Same author

Is amniotic fluid quantitation of value in the diagnosis and conservative management of prelabour membrane rupture at term?

British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology·1990
Same journal

A risk-based classification of late-onset fetal growth disorders according to intrapartum fetal compromise.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

The Cardiac-Fetal-Placental Unit: links between umbilical venous flow and maternal hemodynamics in fetal growth restriction.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Psychosocial interventions for women who are pregnant following a previous reproductive loss: A scoping review.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Controversies in fetal therapy.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Alloimmunisation in pregnancy: current management and future perspectives.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
Same journal

Consensus in prenatal management of Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn.

Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology·2026
See all related articles

Caesarean section rates require re-evaluation, focusing on appropriateness rather than just numbers. Standardized data collection and maternal satisfaction are crucial for improving childbirth care and outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Public Health
  • Maternal Health

Background:

  • Rising caesarean section rates are a significant global concern for healthcare providers and patients.
  • Increasing patient demand for caesarean births necessitates a re-evaluation of responsibilities for these rates.
  • Current data collection lacks standardization, hindering comparative analysis and quality improvement efforts.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for a shift in focus from the absolute number of caesarean sections to their appropriateness.
  • To highlight the need for standardized information collection and classification systems in childbirth.
  • To emphasize the importance of maternal satisfaction as a key outcome in evaluating childbirth practices.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current practices and concerns regarding caesarean section rates.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the need for standardized data collection and classification in obstetrics.
  • Discussion on the role of maternal satisfaction in assessing childbirth outcomes.

    • Main Results:

    • Caesarean section rates should be assessed for appropriateness, not just high or low values.
    • Standardized, statutory data collection is essential for accurate comparisons and care improvements.
    • Maternal satisfaction is a critical factor that must be integrated into childbirth policy changes.

    Conclusions:

    • A redefinition of responsibility for caesarean section rates is needed.
    • Standardized data and consideration of maternal satisfaction are vital for appropriate childbirth care.
    • Caesarean section rates must be viewed within the broader societal context of childbirth.