Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026

Quantification of the Immunosuppressant Tacrolimus on Dried Blood Spots Using LC-MS/MS
Published on: November 8, 2015
Correlation and prediction of phenytoin protein binding using standard laboratory parameters in patients after renal
M S Monaghan1, M A Marx, K M Olsen
1School of Pharmacy and Allied Health Professions and the Center for Practice Improvement and Outcomes Research, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Abstract:
Renal transplant recipients provide a unique model for protein-binding studies in that patients experience hypoalbuminemia and renal dysfunction, both of which alter protein binding. The purposes of this investigation were to model the relationship between serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), albumin, and the unbound fraction of phenytoin (FU, as a percentage) in patients who had undergone renal transplant, and to determine the value of these measurements in predicting FU. Blood from 29 patients was collected at various time points after establishment of graft function. Sera were spiked with phenytoin to a concentration of 15 mg/L, and total/unbound phenytoin concentrations were determined. Correlations between FU and the biochemical indices of serum creatinine, BUN, and albumin were determined using multiple regression. The algorithm with the highest correlation at all times after the transplant became the method to predict future FU. This algorithm was applied prospectively in 23 samples from 14 other patients with variable renal function after transplant. Samples were analyzed as above and the corresponding biochemical indices of serum creatinine, BUN, and albumin were used to calculate FU values. Accuracy of the predictions was evaluated using prediction-error analysis. The best relationship between FU and the measured biochemical indices incorporated serum creatinine and albumin [y = 24.3 + 0.6(serum creatinine) - 3.9(albumin)] and served as the method for FU prediction. Prediction-error analysis resulted in a bias of -5.1% and a precision of 5.7%. This method failed to estimate FU with sufficient accuracy to permit clinical utility. The predicted value underestimated the measured value, and some other variable(s) must be affecting the binding even though serum creatinine and albumin are within or approaching the reference range. Consequently, estimating FU in patients with a history of uremia and hypoalbuminemia, based on measures of serum creatinine and albumin alone, should not be used.
Related Concept Videos
Protein-Drug Binding: Mechanism and Kinetics
Various forces drive these interactions, including hydrogen bonds, hydrophobic interactions, ionic bonds, electrostatic interactions, and van der Waals forces. These bonds enable drugs to bind to specific sites on proteins,...
Protein-Drug Binding: Determination Methods
Indirect methods involve isolating the bound drug from its free form in biological samples such as blood, serum, or plasma. These techniques aim to measure the percentage of drugs bound to proteins. Equilibrium dialysis is a commonly used method where the free drug concentration at equilibrium is measured by separating the bound...
Factors Affecting Protein-Drug Binding: Patient-Related Factors
Age stands as a key determinant in protein-drug binding. Neonates, characterized by low albumin content, experience heightened concentrations of unbound drugs such as phenytoin and...
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Assumption with Protein Binding
Effect of Hepatic Disease on Pharmacokinetics: Pathophysiologic Assessment and Liver Function Test
Drug Dosing in Renal Diseases: Dose Adjustments Based on Drug Clearance and Elimination Rate Constant

